Re: git svn clone with funky tags layout

2013-11-06 Thread Michael J Gruber
Jim Garrison venit, vidit, dixit 05.11.2013 18:16: I'm doing a one-time migration of an svn project. For historical reasons our repo layout is weird: trunk/reporting/reporting_app tags/something_else tags/reporting_app-2.3.45 tags/reporting_app-2.4.46

RE: git svn clone with funky tags layout

2013-11-06 Thread Jim Garrison
-Original Message- From: Michael J Gruber [mailto:g...@drmicha.warpmail.net] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 6:03 AM To: Jim Garrison; git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: git svn clone with funky tags layout Jim Garrison venit, vidit, dixit 05.11.2013 18:16: I'm doing a one-time

git svn clone with funky tags layout

2013-11-05 Thread Jim Garrison
I'm doing a one-time migration of an svn project. For historical reasons our repo layout is weird: trunk/reporting/reporting_app tags/something_else tags/reporting_app-2.3.45 tags/reporting_app-2.4.46 tags/reporting_app-2.4.0 tags/reporting_app-2.4.1

Re: FUNKY tags.

2005-08-17 Thread Martin Langhoff
On 8/17/05, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In my case, at least the most recent of those cvs tag operations was just a 'cvs tag x86info-1_14'. Nothing fancy. I'm fairly sure there was nothing fancy about the earlier instance either. So sure in fact, I had to look up that -F flag in the

FUNKY tags.

2005-08-16 Thread Dave Jones
I just tried a cvs-git conversion using the git-cvsimport-script and cvsps flagged a bunch of tags as **FUNKY** I've no idea what I did when I tagged those trees, but according to a google search, cvsps does that when it find patchsets which are chronologically (and thus by patchset id) earlier

Re: FUNKY tags.

2005-08-16 Thread Martin Langhoff
On 8/17/05, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've no idea what I did when I tagged those trees, but according to a google search, cvsps does that when it find patchsets which are chronologically (and thus by patchset id) earlier than the tag, but are tagwise after. Spooky. It's probably

Re: FUNKY tags.

2005-08-16 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 12:55:18PM +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote: On 8/17/05, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've no idea what I did when I tagged those trees, but according to a google search, cvsps does that when it find patchsets which are chronologically (and thus by patchset