Jim Garrison venit, vidit, dixit 05.11.2013 18:16:
I'm doing a one-time migration of an svn project. For historical reasons our
repo layout is weird:
trunk/reporting/reporting_app
tags/something_else
tags/reporting_app-2.3.45
tags/reporting_app-2.4.46
-Original Message-
From: Michael J Gruber [mailto:g...@drmicha.warpmail.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 6:03 AM
To: Jim Garrison; git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git svn clone with funky tags layout
Jim Garrison venit, vidit, dixit 05.11.2013 18:16:
I'm doing a one-time
I'm doing a one-time migration of an svn project. For historical reasons our
repo layout is weird:
trunk/reporting/reporting_app
tags/something_else
tags/reporting_app-2.3.45
tags/reporting_app-2.4.46
tags/reporting_app-2.4.0
tags/reporting_app-2.4.1
On 8/17/05, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my case, at least the most recent of those cvs tag operations
was just a 'cvs tag x86info-1_14'. Nothing fancy. I'm fairly sure
there was nothing fancy about the earlier instance either.
So sure in fact, I had to look up that -F flag in the
I just tried a cvs-git conversion using the git-cvsimport-script
and cvsps flagged a bunch of tags as **FUNKY**
I've no idea what I did when I tagged those trees, but according
to a google search, cvsps does that when it find patchsets which
are chronologically (and thus by patchset id) earlier
On 8/17/05, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've no idea what I did when I tagged those trees, but according
to a google search, cvsps does that when it find patchsets which
are chronologically (and thus by patchset id) earlier than the tag,
but are tagwise after. Spooky.
It's probably
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 12:55:18PM +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On 8/17/05, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've no idea what I did when I tagged those trees, but according
to a google search, cvsps does that when it find patchsets which
are chronologically (and thus by patchset
7 matches
Mail list logo