Hi Junio,
On 2015-06-21 22:35, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de writes:
On 2015-06-21 19:15, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
That's brilliant.
Just to make sure I am reading you correctly, you mean the current
Hi Randall,
On 2015-06-21 07:09, Randall S. Becker wrote:
On June 21, 2015 12:56 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
As for thinking of a shorter name for the option: assuming the blob integrity
checks can be turned on and off independently as described above, then I
think
it is reasonable to
Hi Michael,
On 2015-06-21 06:55, Michael Haggerty wrote:
On 06/19/2015 10:53 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de writes:
Can you think of a name for the option that is as short as `--quick`
but means the same as `--connectivity-only`?
No I can't. I
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
But now that I'm writing this, a silly question occurs to me: Do we need
an overall option like this at all? If I demote all blob-integrity
checks to ignore via the mechanism that you have added, then shouldn't
fsck automatically detect that it
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Of course, that assumes that you can tell an object is a blob
without unpacking. If a tree entry mentions an object to be a blob
by having 100644 as its mode, unless you unpack the object pointed
at by that tree entry to make sure it is a blob, you
Hi Junio,
On 2015-06-21 19:15, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
But now that I'm writing this, a silly question occurs to me: Do we need
an overall option like this at all? If I demote all blob-integrity
checks to ignore via the mechanism that you have
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de writes:
On 2015-06-21 19:15, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
That's brilliant.
Just to make sure I am reading you correctly, you mean the current
overall structure:
[...]
The way I read Michael's mail,
On 06/19/2015 10:53 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de writes:
Can you think of a name for the option that is as short as `--quick`
but means the same as `--connectivity-only`?
No I can't. I think `--connectivity-only` is a very good name that
is
On June 21, 2015 12:56 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
On 06/19/2015 10:53 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de writes:
Can you think of a name for the option that is as short as `--quick`
but means the same as `--connectivity-only`?
No I can't. I
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 01:53:01PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de writes:
Can you think of a name for the option that is as short as `--quick`
but means the same as `--connectivity-only`?
No I can't. I think `--connectivity-only` is a very
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de writes:
This option avoids unpacking each and all objects, and just verifies the
connectivity.
That sounds like marketing ;-)
Wow this does not unpack unnecessarily, wait, it needs to unpack
and parse 3 out of 4 kinds of objects?
Jokes aside,
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de writes:
Can you think of a name for the option that is as short as `--quick`
but means the same as `--connectivity-only`?
No I can't. I think `--connectivity-only` is a very good name that
is unfortunately a mouthful, I agree that we need a name
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de writes:
Jokes aside, given that you should regularly repack your repository
anyway, I do not think it is such a big downside that this mode
misses a corrupt objects, and the 1 out of 4 kinds of objects,
i.e. blobs, occupy major part of the
Scott Schmit i.g...@comcast.net writes:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 01:53:01PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Schindelin johannes.schinde...@gmx.de writes:
Can you think of a name for the option that is as short as `--quick`
but means the same as `--connectivity-only`?
No I can't.
14 matches
Mail list logo
