Re: [RFE] Add minimal universal release management capabilities to GIT

2017-10-27 Thread nicolas . mailhot
- Mail original - De: "Jacob Keller" Hi Jacob, > I think that this could easily be built by a separate script which provides > git release command line and uses tags under the hood in a > well formed way. True, the difficulty is not technical, the whole scheme is basic and KISS.

Re: [RFE] Add minimal universal release management capabilities to GIT

2017-10-24 Thread Jacob Keller
On October 21, 2017 6:56:51 AM PDT, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: > > >- Mail original - >De: "Stefan Beller" > >> git tags ? > >Too loosely defined to be relied on by project-agnostic tools. That's >what most tools won't ever try to use those. Anything you will define >around

Re: [RFE] Add minimal universal release management capabilities to GIT

2017-10-23 Thread nicolas . mailhot
- Mail original - De: "Randall S. Becker" >> Git is a wonderful tool, which has transformed how software is created, and >> made code sharing and reuse, a lot easier (both >> between human and software tools). >> Please please please add release handling and versioning capabilities

Re: [RFE] Add minimal universal release management capabilities to GIT

2017-10-23 Thread nicolas . mailhot
- Mail original - De: "Kaartic Sivaraam" > > Heads up, I'm gonna play the devil's advocate a little, here. Be my guest, you're not alone. On Sat, 2017-10-21 at 15:56 +0200, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: > No that is not up to the hash function. First because hashes are too > long

Re: [RFE] Add minimal universal release management capabilities to GIT

2017-10-22 Thread Kaartic Sivaraam
Heads up, I'm gonna play the devil's advocate a little, here. On Sat, 2017-10-21 at 15:56 +0200, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: > No that is not up to the hash function. First because hashes are too > long to be manipulated by humans, and second no hash will ever > capture human intent. You

RE: [RFE] Add minimal universal release management capabilities to GIT

2017-10-21 Thread Randall S. Becker
-Original Message- From: git-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:git-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf of.mail...@laposte.net On October 20, 2017 6:41 AM, nicolas wrote: To: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFE] Add minimal universal release management capabilities to GIT >Git is a wonderful tool,

Re: [RFE] Add minimal universal release management capabilities to GIT

2017-10-21 Thread nicolas . mailhot
- Mail original - De: "Stefan Beller" >> Unfortunately Git is so good more and more developers start to procrastinate >> on any activity that happens outside of GIT, >> starting with cutting releases. The meme "one only needs a git commit hash" >> is going strong, even infecting

Re: [RFE] Add minimal universal release management capabilities to GIT

2017-10-20 Thread Stefan Beller
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 3:40 AM, wrote: > Hi, > > Git is a wonderful tool, which has transformed how software is created, and > made code sharing and reuse, a lot easier (both between human and software > tools). > > Unfortunately Git is so good more and more