From: Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 3:29 AM
bitquabit.com/post/unorthodocs-abandon-your-dvcs-and-return-to-sanity
--
The part that the author misses is not all the nice (or not so) stuff
about having a copy of the full repository locally, for all the reasons
On 03/04/2015 08:55 PM, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Yes, that article has a few really weak lines of arguments, such as the
tutorial count.
Here's his definition of the main draw of a DVCS:
No, the only thing that a DVCS gets you, by definition, is that
everyone gets a copy of the full
David Lang venit, vidit, dixit 04.03.2015 01:53:
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Shawn Pearce wrote:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com wrote:
bitquabit.com/post/unorthodocs-abandon-your-dvcs-and-return-to-sanity
Indeed, a DVCS like Git or Hg does not fit everyone. And
Shawn Pearce spea...@spearce.org writes:
We have heard this sort of feedback for years. But we have been unable
to adequately write our own documentation or clean up our man pages to
be useful to the average person who doesn't know why the --no-frobbing
option doesn't disable the --frobinator
On 03 Mar 2015, Shawn Pearce Wrote:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com wrote:
bitquabit.com/post/unorthodocs-abandon-your-dvcs-and-return-to-sanity
Indeed, a DVCS like Git or Hg does not fit everyone. And neither do
centralized
systems like Subversion.
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com wrote:
bitquabit.com/post/unorthodocs-abandon-your-dvcs-and-return-to-sanity
Indeed, a DVCS like Git or Hg does not fit everyone. And neither do
centralized systems like Subversion. Choice is good.
However... I found some passages
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Shawn Pearce wrote:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Stefan Beller sbel...@google.com wrote:
bitquabit.com/post/unorthodocs-abandon-your-dvcs-and-return-to-sanity
Indeed, a DVCS like Git or Hg does not fit everyone. And neither do
centralized systems like Subversion.
7 matches
Mail list logo
