Thanks Mike.
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 02:38:08PM -0400, rajdeep mondal wrote:
>> Hi Randall,
>>
>> I completely agree to what you are saying, but sometimes it just so
>> happens that in the middle of a change, i feel like if
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 02:38:08PM -0400, rajdeep mondal wrote:
> Hi Randall,
>
> I completely agree to what you are saying, but sometimes it just so
> happens that in the middle of a change, i feel like if some portion of
> the changes are fine I can commit them. Stashing some of the files
>
Hi Randall,
I completely agree to what you are saying, but sometimes it just so
happens that in the middle of a change, i feel like if some portion of
the changes are fine I can commit them. Stashing some of the files
and being able to check the compile/tests at this point would be a
really
rajdeep mondal writes:
> git version 2.6.3
> OS: RHEL 6
>
> Work around found in:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3040833/stash-only-one-file-out-of-multiple-files-that-have-changed-with-git
>
> Workaround is not very optimal. Please add this support to git.
This
-Original Message-
On June 6, 2017 9:23 AM, rajdeep mondal wrote:
>Work around found in:
>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3040833/stash-only-one-file-out-of-multiple-files-that-have-changed-with-git
>Workaround is not very optimal. Please add this support to git.
Instead of using
5 matches
Mail list logo