On Tuesday, September 3, 2013 7:46:47 PM UTC+2, Hans Ginzel wrote:
> I get
>
> eef5296 Thu Aug 15 16:37:35 2013 +0200 msg3
> 1e68ecb Wed Aug 14 11:08:22 2013 +0200 msg2
> 4959e91 Mon Jul 29 12:03:09 2013 +0200 msg1
>
> with my locale
>
> LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
> LC_ALL="en_GB.UTF-8"
>
>
>>
Append --dat
On Tuesday, September 3, 2013 10:34:38 PM UTC+2, Ling wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm kinds of new on Git and now we are trying to get the hooks enabled
> into one of our server repository, what we want this hooks doing is to
> prevent when local users that push the changes from their local repo to
>
Truckload of thanks for the explanation.
It must have taken a lot of iron wire to bend it for me. :-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to g
On Tuesday, September 3, 2013 8:07:06 PM UTC+5:30, William Seiti Mizuta
wrote:
> Hi Dexter,
>
> you are using option x in git clean command. In the manual, the option x
> tells:
>
> -x
>Don’t use the standard ignore rules read from .gitignore (per
> directory) and $GIT_DIR/info/
Hello,
I'm kinds of new on Git and now we are trying to get the hooks enabled into
one of our server repository, what we want this hooks doing is to
prevent when local users that push the changes from their local repo to
server repo, we need to first check the commit comments to see if it
inc
I know this is from several years ago, but did you ever come up with a
solution to this? I'm currently running into the same problem, using
dropbearkey and git through Terminal IDE on an ASUS android tablet. The
push works, but I get "The remote end hung up unexpectedly" and the
post-receive ho
I get
eef5296 Thu Aug 15 16:37:35 2013 +0200 msg3
1e68ecb Wed Aug 14 11:08:22 2013 +0200 msg2
4959e91 Mon Jul 29 12:03:09 2013 +0200 msg1
with my locale
LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
LC_ALL="en_GB.UTF-8"
Dne úterý, 3. září 2013 17:30:09 UTC+2 John McKown napsal(a):
>
> See if:
>
> git log --format="%h %cd %
On 4 September 2013 01:20, John McKown wrote:
> If you don't want to do a commit, then do a stash. It puts the current
> working directory "off to the side". Like a temporary branch. When you want
> to come back, then you do a git stash pop.
>
> I think I understand how you're working. You likely
For milestones, I either create a new branch at that commit point (rarely)
or tag the commit with a nice name.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:40 AM, David wrote:
> On 4 September 2013 01:20, John McKown
> wrote:
> > If you don't want to do a commit, then do a stash. It puts the current
> > working
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 08:05:23 -0700 (PDT)
maya melnick wrote:
[...]
> but I imagine in other situations, to have to commit every time
> before switching branches is weird... what if you haven't finished
> work on a branch and need to switch branches to take care of another
> problem, but don't want
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:20:06 -0500
John McKown wrote:
> If you don't want to do a commit, then do a stash. It puts the current
> working directory "off to the side". Like a temporary branch.
This comparison is quite to the point -- the `git stash` command even
allows to create a new branch from a
See if:
git log --format="%h %cd %s"
gives you what you want. It looks like you last example, with only the date.
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Hans Ginzel wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I get with git log --format="%h %ci %s"
>
> eef5296 2013-08-15 16:37:35 +0200 msg3
> 1e68ecb 2013-08-14 11:08:22
> From: maya melnick
>
> (I haven't commited, it's just a test branch, I don't want to commit;-)
> make sense?
The way to think about it is that you've just changed a file in the
working directory, it isn't *in* the branch or the repository. So
when you tell Git to shuffle the working dir
On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 08:05 -0700, maya melnick wrote:
> but I imagine in other situations, to have to commit every time before
> switching branches is weird... what if you haven't finished work on a
> branch and need to switch branches to take care of another problem,
> but don't want to commit wh
yes thanks a lot !!!
and so fast and easy... !
Le mardi 3 septembre 2013 12:03:30 UTC+2, Konstantin Khomoutov a écrit :
>
> On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 02:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
> Quentin Silvestre > wrote:
>
> > I have a repository with a remote repository.
> > My colleague had the very bad idea to put 4 pr
Hello!
I get with git log --format="%h %ci %s"
eef5296 2013-08-15 16:37:35 +0200 msg3
1e68ecb 2013-08-14 11:08:22 +0200 msg2
4959e91 2013-07-29 12:03:09 +0200 msg1
How can I achieve this output please?
eef5296 2013-08-15 16:37 msg3
1e68ecb 2013-08-14 11:08 msg2
4959e91 2013-07-29 12:03 msg1
Or
If you don't want to do a commit, then do a stash. It puts the current
working directory "off to the side". Like a temporary branch. When you want
to come back, then you do a git stash pop.
I think I understand how you're working. You likely only do a "commit" when
you think something is "finished
thank you all very much for your responses this is the first time I'm
back on Usenet in a long time... it had become practically unusable b/c of
the spam, but I see that google got its act together here, and has somehow
managed to deal with the spam...;-) this is good to know...
yes, I s
Hi Dexter,
you are using option x in git clean command. In the manual, the option x
tells:
-x
Don’t use the standard ignore rules read from .gitignore (per
directory) and $GIT_DIR/info/exclude, but do still use the ignore rules
given with -e options. This allows removing all untrac
hi,
when i run git clean -xfd, git deletes my tags file.
i have the tag file listed in gitignore, but how do
i tell git not to remove the tags file.
-dexter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 06:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
maya melnick wrote:
[...]
> but in my case when I switch back to branch master the changes I made
> in branch 'test' do not get reverted I look in the dir and the
> one file I added in branch 'test' is still there when I have switched
> to branch 'mast
On 3 September 2013 23:44, maya melnick wrote:
>
> but in my case when I switch back to branch master the changes I made in
> branch 'test' do not get reverted I look in the dir and the one file I
> added in branch 'test' is still there when I have switched to branch
> 'master'...
>
> (I have
If you don't commit the changes Git won't do anything to them when you
change branches, I.e. they'll still be there but this time on top of
master. As you don't want to commit the changes you'll need to "stash" them
instead to get to a clean state. A checkout of master should then get what
you
Check back this list's history. There was an identical problem a few days
ago.
On 3 Sep 2013 15:44, "maya melnick" wrote:
>
>
>
> hi,
>
> I'm just starting out with Git... I have a little issue with branching:
>
> I'm in branch master; I create a new branch; checkout new branch (called
> 'test')
hi,
I'm just starting out with Git... I have a little issue with branching:
I'm in branch master; I create a new branch; checkout new branch (called
'test'); I make changes and save them; I switch back to branch master; but
changes I made in branch 'test' are still there... they do not get
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013 21:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
Juha Aaltonen wrote:
> I guess I described the problem.
I guess I explained the reason for `git fetch` reporting everything is
up-to-date and `git pull` complaining about conflicts.
> I don't seem to be able to update my working tree from the remote
> rep
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 02:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
Quentin Silvestre wrote:
> I have a repository with a remote repository.
> My colleague had the very bad idea to put 4 project into the same
> repository.
> So basically here is my folder structure:
> root
> + project 1
> + project 2
> + project 3
> +
Hi guys,
I have a repository with a remote repository.
My colleague had the very bad idea to put 4 project into the same
repository.
So basically here is my folder structure:
root
+ project 1
+ project 2
+ project 3
+ project 4
So I'm trying to separate all theses projects in 4 different git
Thank for you answers.
Am Dienstag, 3. September 2013 10:44:10 UTC+2 schrieb Magnus Therning:
>
> Your email client seems to be set to sending HTML-only, which means my
> email client wasn't able to display the illustration of the SVN repo
> properly. I've hopefully guessed correctly in my att
*I manually loaded a few files in my repository and some files are now
ignored without being specified as ignored in gitignore.*
*here is a brief discussion on stack overflow on this issue. We suspect
this is a bug.*
*
*
http://chat.stackoverflow.com/rooms/36566/discussion-between-xdrone-and-jsz
I manually replaced come files in a dev repo and not i have a few files
ignored without add these files to gitignore. We suspect this is a bug,
here is a discussion that prompted this post.
http://chat.stackoverflow.com/rooms/36566/discussion-between-xdrone-and-jszakmeister
--
You received this
On Tuesday, September 3, 2013 10:44:10 AM UTC+2, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Based on your description above I think you can get away with only a
> single central git repo that the country-based operations can clone.
> The country-repos would then base their 'master' on a tag, make a few
> country
Thanks for the input guys. We could do an automatic sync with manual
notifications on merge conflicts (would probably be rare), but I think we
will smplify our setup like Konstantin suggests.
For reference:
* We have many readers of the repo in zone two, so we set up a clone
--mirror as a read
Your email client seems to be set to sending HTML-only, which means my
email client wasn't able to display the illustration of the SVN repo
properly. I've hopefully guessed correctly in my attempt to adjust it
below ;)
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 10:40:55PM -0700, Sascha Egerer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we a
If you want to keep your process relatively similar then I think it might
look something like...
development (repo)
- master (<=> trunk)
- branches from master.
- tags on master.
de (repo)
- master (<=> trunk)
- branches from master (if necessary, probably a good practice to create
a
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 09:59:43PM -0700, Juha Aaltonen wrote:
> To put it more clearly:
>
> There are a couple of guys working with a code and there's a common
> repo on a server.
>
> I cloned the remote repo with both Giteye and SourceTree (two
> different clones).
> I edited the code cloned wi
36 matches
Mail list logo
