On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:16:08PM -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
>>> Does it seem incorrect to anyone else that "git clean -X" doesn't
>>> delete all the files in your workspace that are considered ignored
>>> by "git status"?
Well, reading the man page for `git clean` like a lawyer (my emphasis
below)
When on Windows I install an msys2[1] system with git and vim. I
generally don't have many issues with line endings, but there is one
recurring irritating issue: diff markers at merge conflicts.
The files I work on are all using DOS line endings, but the diff
markers are inserted using Unix line
On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 10:05 +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:16:08PM -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> >>> Does it seem incorrect to anyone else that "git clean -X" doesn't
> >>> delete all the files in your workspace that are considered ignored
> >>> by "git status"?
>
> Well,
From: "Paul Smith"
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [git-users] git clean vs git status re .gitignore
On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 10:05 +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:16:08PM -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
>>> Does it seem incorrect to anyone else that "git cl
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 07:41:46AM -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 10:05 +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:16:08PM -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > >>> Does it seem incorrect to anyone else that "git clean -X" doesn't
> > >>> delete all the files in your work
On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 21:05 +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 07:41:46AM -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 10:05 +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
> > > So, it could be argued it does what it says, it removes all *files*
> > > ignored by git, not ignored *folders*
