Hello,
this depends on your workflow. In the workflow of one of my projects we
would rebase branch1, test and fast-forward merge it to master. Then rebase
branch2 to the new master, test, ff-merge, etc.
On GitHub this would probably mean 4 subsequent merging.
On some other project it may be an o
Lets say I have 4 branches off master. I have tested, and found that they are
all ready to go. What's the best way to merge them in?
Is it:
1. A single merge onto master of all 4 branches at once.
2. One-by-one merging from the commit where they branched off, in order of
oldest branch first.
3.
This may seem a little strange. I'd like to merge parts of one commit sequence
into another.
Off of "master", I have a bunch of small sequences of 3-4 commits, generally.
Each on their own branch.
I have "integrationTest", branched off master, that has each of these merged in.
>From Integratio