On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 1:33 AM, David Aguilar wrote:
> Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>I know 'git ci' is perfectly fine shortcut to 'git commit'.
>>
>>Either way, it doesn't matter. Even if we agree that /etc/gitconfig.d
>>is what we want, or we add an /usr/share/git/config, Junio is not
>>going to a
Felipe Contreras wrote:
>I know 'git ci' is perfectly fine shortcut to 'git commit'.
>
>Either way, it doesn't matter. Even if we agree that /etc/gitconfig.d
>is what we want, or we add an /usr/share/git/config, Junio is not
>going to apply any patch, even if it's what most users want.
Please sto
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:44 PM, David Aguilar wrote:
> Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>David Aguilar wrote:
>>> Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>> >On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Aguilar
>>> >wrote:
>>> >>>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>> Will this not c
Felipe Contreras wrote:
>David Aguilar wrote:
>> Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> >On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Aguilar
>> >wrote:
>> >>>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar
>> >wrote:
>>
>> Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own
>gitconfig?
>> >>
>> >>>
David Aguilar wrote:
> Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Aguilar
> >wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar
> >wrote:
>
> Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own gitconfig?
> >>
> >>> You mean people that provide their
Felipe Contreras wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Aguilar
>wrote:
>>>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar
>wrote:
Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own gitconfig?
>>
>>> You mean people that provide their own ETC_GITCONFIG? If you mean
>> distr
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, David Aguilar wrote:
>>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar wrote:
>>>
>>> Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own gitconfig?
>
>> You mean people that provide their own ETC_GITCONFIG? If you mean
> distributions, their packaging would ov
>On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar wrote:
>>
>> Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own gitconfig?
> You mean people that provide their own ETC_GITCONFIG? If you mean
distributions, their packaging would override /etc/gitconfig, if you
mean people that have already a
Apologies for top post -- anybody have a recommendation for a better app then
maildroid?
Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own gitconfig?
I like the idea. Docs? Also, should this not be done in the C side so that we
don't waste time reading the config, and also prevent users
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, David Aguilar wrote:
> Apologies for top post -- anybody have a recommendation for a better app then
> maildroid?
>
> Will this not conflict with folks that supply their own gitconfig?
You mean people that provide their own ETC_GITCONFIG? If you mean
distribution
10 matches
Mail list logo