[git-users] Re: How to organise the workflow

On Wednesday, 1 May 2013 14:04:07 UTC+1, And Ro wrote: > > Hello! > > I have a bare repository hosting on a local server and a few local clients > with working copies of that repository. > I was going to a business trip so I had to clone the repository on a new > laptop before leaving. But I wa

[git-users] Re: How to organise the workflow

On Wednesday, 1 May 2013 14:04:07 UTC+1, And Ro wrote: > > Hello! > > I have a bare repository hosting on a local server and a few local clients > with working copies of that repository. > I was going to a business trip so I had to clone the repository on a new > laptop before leaving. But I w

[git-users] Re: How to organise the workflow

Philip, thank you so much for your help. I did not realise that is just a timestamp issue. I followed your suggestion and now everything seems to be OK. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Re: [git-users] Re: How to organise the workflow

> From: Philip Oakley > > Update > Just found > http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/gitk-pays-too-much-attention-to-file-timestamps-td4861833.html > "git update-index --refresh -q" (may need a trailing '*') appears to be the > plumbing command > (see third item *Jonathan > Nieder-2*