I use it often to split a complex commit into independent parts, maybe even make one of those parts be a `fixup! ` commit.
If purposeful (first case) then you are already interactive and it feels sensible. If it was an 'automatic' rebase (non-interactive until conflict) then you may find you still need to rearrange and split the commit into sensible parts, or even stash parts. [That reminds me, the git-gui doesn't have an easy stash option, which can also be useful] On Tuesday, October 18, 2022 at 11:44:48 AM UTC+1 sameer.s...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello, > > git should not allow commit while in middle of rebase but allow only > rebase --continue until all conflicts are resolved. > > are there any use cases where someone may want to commit in middle of > rebase before rebase --continue? > > I know I shouldn't have done it but it has been a means of agony for me > some times :) > > thanks, > Sameer > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/git-users/41cb6fe4-73e4-49dc-949e-fccc9dadf392n%40googlegroups.com.
