Re: [git-users] Re: keeping two bare repos in sync?

2013-10-03 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 06:45:14 -0700 (PDT) dkoleary wrote: > Absolutely amazing, sir! Your answer is spot on accurate, very > complete, and very detailed. While I sorry that I put you to that > much unpaid work, I am very grateful. I'm going to bookmark this > explanation and refer to it regularly

Re: [git-users] Re: keeping two bare repos in sync?

2013-10-03 Thread dkoleary
Hey; Absolutely amazing, sir! Your answer is spot on accurate, very complete, and very detailed. While I sorry that I put you to that much unpaid work, I am very grateful. I'm going to bookmark this explanation and refer to it regularly until the concept sticks. I have a grasp on it now; but

Re: [git-users] Re: keeping two bare repos in sync?

2013-10-03 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:04:28 -0700 (PDT) dkoleary wrote: > Apologies for replying to my own post, but I did just find the "git > --bare fetch". While that seems to have worked, That's odd: `git fetch` does not support "--bare", only `git clone` does. If `git fetch` doesn't fail on this option,

[git-users] Re: keeping two bare repos in sync?

2013-10-02 Thread dkoleary
Apologies for replying to my own post, but I did just find the "git --bare fetch". While that seems to have worked, # git --bare fetch ${prod}:/opt/app/git/filemover >From ${prod}:/opt/app/git/filemover * branchHEAD -> FETCH_HEAD how do I go about getting those changes into