Bug: git log: boundary commits do not respect order (e.g. date-order, topo-order) 2

2018-02-21 Thread Josh Tepper
When using git log, boundary commits (ie, those commits added by specifying --boundary) do not respect the order (e.g., --date-order, --topo-order). Consider the following commit history, where number indicates the order of the commit timestamps: 0125 <--A \ \

Bug: git log: boundary commits do not respect order (e.g. date-order, topo-order)

2018-02-21 Thread Josh Tepper
When using git log, boundary commits (ie, those commits added by specifying --boundary) do not respect the order (e.g., --date-order, --topo-order). Consider the following commit history, where number indicates the order of the commit timestamps: 0125 <--A \ \

Re: Bug: git log: boundary commits do not respect order (e.g. date-order, topo-order)

2018-02-21 Thread Josh Tepper
TYPO IN EXPECTED OUTPUT. To avoid inevitable confusion, creating new thread "Bug: git log: boundary commits do not respect order (e.g. date-order, topo-order) 2". DON'T REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. Instead reply to the new message On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 6:28 PM, Josh Tepper <j...

Re: Bug: git log: boundary commits do not respect order (e.g. date-order, topo-order) 2

2018-03-01 Thread Josh Tepper
I just wanted to follow up -- what do you think? On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:21 PM, Josh Tepper <j...@clarifai.com> wrote: > My use case is that when combined with --graph, the ordering is > necessary to render a reasonable looking commit graph; by placing the > commits at the end