liyafan82 commented on pull request #7326:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7326#issuecomment-679458247
> > The conda integration test is failing, because the default no
compression option is not supported by the specification. Maybe we need to
start a discussion in the ML.
>
liyafan82 commented on pull request #7326:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7326#issuecomment-674618715
> > The conda integration test is failing, because the default no
compression option is not supported by the specification. Maybe we need to
start a discussion in the ML.
>
liyafan82 commented on pull request #7326:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7326#issuecomment-673213128
The conda integration test is failing, because the default no compression
option is not supported by the specification. Maybe we need to start a
discussion in the ML.
---
liyafan82 commented on pull request #7326:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7326#issuecomment-669111978
> At the very least I think this needs more comments as to why it appears
that manual serializion of flatbuffer data is being used.
>
> It would also be nice to avoid intr
liyafan82 commented on pull request #7326:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7326#issuecomment-644563536
> Hi, I have a question... probably not related to what this PR focus on.
> What if the compressor / decompressor for the codec will have JNI call for
compression / decomperss
liyafan82 commented on pull request #7326:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7326#issuecomment-640584596
Thanks a lot for your good comments. Please see my reply in line.
> Looks good, few minor comments. It would be good to see this in a test (if
that is reasonable/possible
