iffyio closed issue #1923: Postgres: Support negative scale for `NUMERIC`
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1923
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specif
iffyio merged PR #1990:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1990
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr
iffyio closed issue #1858: Postgres: Incorrect ending line reported in `Span`
for multi-line query
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1858
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
iffyio merged PR #1999:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1999
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr
shehabgamin commented on code in PR #17022:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17022#discussion_r2264513839
##
datafusion/core/tests/parquet/page_pruning.rs:
##
@@ -903,8 +903,8 @@ async fn without_pushdown_filter() {
)
.unwrap();
-// Same amount of b
comphead commented on code in PR #2057:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2057#discussion_r2264507470
##
native/proto/src/proto/types.proto:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agre
kosiew commented on issue #17086:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/17086#issuecomment-3169846380
After more thought on this, I think it is more reasonable that
VirtualObjectStore stays read-only. In practice when you write you already know
which backend you want (S3, local F
kosiew closed issue #17086: Implement write support in VirtualObjectStore
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/17086
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
zhuqi-lucas opened a new pull request, #17105:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17105
## Which issue does this PR close?
Revive https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16249
## Rationale for this change
Revive https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/
zhuqi-lucas commented on PR #17105:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17105#issuecomment-3169768311
FYI @alamb @Dandandan
I try to revive the PR https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16249, and
we may run the benchmark for this PR to see if any changes since then, th
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #99:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/99#discussion_r2264201932
##
content/blog/2025-08-15-external-parquet-indexes.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,772 @@
+---
+layout: post
+title: Using External Indexes, Metadata Stores, Catalogs and Ca
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #16166: Set Formatted TableOptions Enum
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16166
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comme
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #16329:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16329#issuecomment-3169654735
Thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately, this pull request is stale
because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Please remove the stale
label or comment or
andygrove merged PR #2085:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2085
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@
shehabgamin commented on PR #99:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/99#issuecomment-3169605025
Really solid blog post!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specif
IndexSeek commented on code in PR #1990:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1990#discussion_r2264190270
##
src/parser/mod.rs:
##
@@ -11229,6 +11229,30 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
}
}
+/// Parse an optionally signed integer literal.
+
IndexSeek commented on code in PR #1990:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1990#discussion_r2264190270
##
src/parser/mod.rs:
##
@@ -11229,6 +11229,30 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
}
}
+/// Parse an optionally signed integer literal.
+
codecov-commenter commented on PR #2099:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2099#issuecomment-3169626650
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2099?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_ca
IndexSeek commented on code in PR #1999:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1999#discussion_r2264184902
##
tests/sqlparser_common.rs:
##
@@ -4758,6 +4758,25 @@ fn parse_alter_table() {
}
}
+#[test]
+fn alter_table_span_includes_semicolon() {
+
corwinjoy commented on PR #17103:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17103#issuecomment-3169612864
@adamreeve
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
T
corwinjoy commented on PR #17103:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17103#issuecomment-3169612801
I'm unsure what's causing the failed CI test. I don't see an error locally,
and it is flagging a nonexistent line number, so I don't know what to fix.
--
This is an automated mes
coderfender commented on issue #2096:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/2096#issuecomment-3169605057
Raised a PR with explanation on the issue
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
Standing-Man commented on PR #16940:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16940#issuecomment-3169598741
Hi @alamb, no rush, but when you have some time, I’d love your review on
this PR. Thanks in advance!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
coderfender commented on PR #2099:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2099#issuecomment-3169604791
@andygrove , The issue is with implementation of `rpad` to only support
col,int signature . Rather than reverting to native spark code, I went ahead
and implemented native
shehabgamin commented on code in PR #17022:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17022#discussion_r2264173720
##
datafusion/datasource-parquet/src/file_format.rs:
##
@@ -968,19 +973,41 @@ pub async fn fetch_parquet_metadata(
meta: &ObjectMeta,
size_hint: Opti
shehabgamin commented on code in PR #17022:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17022#discussion_r2264173426
##
datafusion/datasource-parquet/src/mod.rs:
##
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ pub mod file_format;
mod metrics;
mod opener;
mod page_filter;
-mod reader;
+pub mod reade
corwinjoy commented on issue #17104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/17104#issuecomment-3169598205
Fixed by https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17103.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
corwinjoy opened a new issue, #17104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/17104
### Describe the bug
The visit function for ConfigFileEncryption properties failed to visit the
member column_encryption_properties.
### To Reproduce
_No response_
### Exp
corwinjoy opened a new pull request, #17103:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17103
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
The visit function for `ConfigFileEncryption` properties failed to visit the
member `colu
parthchandra commented on code in PR #2100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2100#discussion_r2264165976
##
spark/src/main/scala/org/apache/comet/parquet/CometNativeFilters.scala:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,211 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) u
parthchandra commented on PR #1915:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1915#issuecomment-3169545796
@andygrove It does look like the creator of dragonbox is recommending we
fork their code. It does create some bloat if we include it in Comet. Is there
any other alternativ
AdamGS opened a new pull request, #17102:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17102
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #17101.
## Rationale for this change
Make both macros slightly nicer to use, and prevent some potentially
confusing error messag
AdamGS opened a new issue, #17101:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/17101
Both `create_array!` and `record_batch!` currently require `arrow` as a
dependency exactly, not allowing users to pull subcrates or even re-use the
re-exported arrow version.
--
This is an automated
shruti2522 commented on issue #17048:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/17048#issuecomment-3169431248
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
kazuyukitanimura commented on code in PR #2098:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2098#discussion_r2264066285
##
spark/src/main/scala/org/apache/comet/serde/QueryPlanSerde.scala:
##
@@ -852,62 +852,6 @@ object QueryPlanSerde extends Logging with CometExprShim
parthchandra commented on code in PR #2057:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2057#discussion_r2264063147
##
native/proto/src/proto/types.proto:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license
shruti2522 opened a new pull request, #17100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17100
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #17072 .
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these change
codecov-commenter commented on PR #2100:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2100#issuecomment-3169397214
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2100?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_ca
kazuyukitanimura commented on code in PR #2100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2100#discussion_r2264041752
##
spark/src/main/scala/org/apache/comet/parquet/CometNativeFilters.scala:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,211 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (AS
josh0yeh commented on PR #2100:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2100#issuecomment-3169331714
CC: @andygrove @parthchandra (please feel free to cc others I might overlook)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please lo
josh0yeh opened a new pull request, #2100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2100
Before Spark 3.4.3, `ParquetFilters` were added originally so we could shade
Parquet in Comet. Since, `ParquetFilters` has updated In/NotIn pushdown which
comet needs. Remove `ParquetFilters
coderfender commented on PR #2073:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2073#issuecomment-3169248160
@andygrove , thank you for restarting the failed job and glad to see that
the checks have all passed. Please review once you get a chance and let me know
if you think we ne
findepi commented on code in PR #17081:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17081#discussion_r2263934637
##
datafusion/expr/src/udwf.rs:
##
@@ -305,10 +305,7 @@ where
/// .build()
/// .unwrap();
/// ```
-pub trait WindowUDFImpl: Debug + Send + Sync {
-/
coderfender commented on PR #2073:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2073#issuecomment-3169097452
One of the TPC-H check failed with a network exception. @andygrove could you
please re trigger that workflow whenever you get a chance?
Thank you
--
This is an automa
findepi commented on PR #17081:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17081#issuecomment-3169195271
The dependency PRs have been merged, will rebase
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17078
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17080
- https://github.com/a
alamb commented on code in PR #17080:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17080#discussion_r2263843097
##
datafusion/expr/src/udaf.rs:
##
@@ -1059,6 +1056,7 @@ impl AliasedAggregateUDFImpl {
}
}
+#[warn(clippy::missing_trait_methods)] // Delegates, so it shoul
alamb merged PR #17080:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17080
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on code in PR #17021:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17021#discussion_r2263831579
##
datafusion-cli/src/exec.rs:
##
@@ -227,9 +227,19 @@ pub(super) async fn exec_and_print(
let statements = DFParser::parse_sql_with_dialect(&sql, dialect.as_
alamb commented on PR #17084:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17084#issuecomment-3168958975
FYI @EmilyMatt -- I am not sure if you have seen what @kosiew is working on
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
findepi commented on PR #16964:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16964#issuecomment-3169060386
I think it would make sense to add some validation to GH workflows that all
3rd party actions are indeed sha-pinned.
It can be yet another workflow, but it can also be just a Rust
alamb commented on PR #16779:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16779#issuecomment-3168980534
Thanks again @adamreeve
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific co
findepi commented on PR #17078:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17078#issuecomment-3169039418
> `a == b` will effectively call `PartialEq`
yes
> and we dont need separate impl for `Eq`?
`Eq` is a marker trait. Implementing `Eq` is a promise that `P
findepi commented on code in PR #17046:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17046#discussion_r2263819885
##
.github/workflows/docs_generated.yaml:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor license agreem
findepi commented on code in PR #16970:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16970#discussion_r2263815378
##
datafusion/physical-expr/src/scalar_function.rs:
##
@@ -164,6 +175,42 @@ impl fmt::Display for ScalarFunctionExpr {
}
}
+impl DynEq for ScalarFunctionEx
findepi opened a new pull request, #17099:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17099
implements:
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17078#discussion_r2263312644
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to G
findepi commented on code in PR #17078:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17078#discussion_r2263813896
##
datafusion/physical-expr/src/scalar_function.rs:
##
@@ -175,42 +173,47 @@ impl fmt::Display for ScalarFunctionExpr {
}
}
-impl DynEq for ScalarFunctionE
findepi commented on code in PR #17078:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17078#discussion_r2263811540
##
datafusion/physical-expr/src/scalar_function.rs:
##
@@ -175,42 +173,47 @@ impl fmt::Display for ScalarFunctionExpr {
}
}
-impl DynEq for ScalarFunctionE
findepi merged PR #17078:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17078
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafu
gopidesupavan commented on code in PR #17046:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17046#discussion_r2263797875
##
.github/workflows/docs_generated.yaml:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor license
alamb commented on PR #16999:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16999#issuecomment-3169021559
> The docs need to be updated too.
In 6c283dfca
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
alamb commented on issue #17010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/17010#issuecomment-3168966927
The blog is ready for review
PR:
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/99
Rendered Preview:
https://datafusion.staged.apache.org/blog/2025/08/15/externa
alamb commented on code in PR #17046:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17046#discussion_r2263770464
##
.github/workflows/docs_generated.yaml:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor license agreemen
alamb commented on code in PR #17046:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17046#discussion_r2263772727
##
.github/workflows/docs_generated.yaml:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor license agreemen
alamb merged PR #16779:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16779
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb closed issue #16778: More flexible Parquet encryption configuration
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16778
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
alamb commented on PR #16779:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16779#issuecomment-3168980303
Let's get it merged so we can begin testing more easily
@mbutrovich it would be great if you could test this with comet before the
50.0.0 release so that we can make any adjustm
alamb merged PR #17096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17096
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on issue #17095:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/17095#issuecomment-3168956601
> It would be nice to unify this logic, and make the design/relationship
between FileSource and FileScanConfig much simpler.
I agree it would be nice to make this simpler
adriangb commented on PR #17076:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17076#issuecomment-3168950104
Right big picture here I think it's quite evident that there are large
issues with the current design: coupling, circular references, etc. Just take a
look at this:
https://
alamb opened a new issue, #17098:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/17098
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
This came up in the context of an internal investigation I did at
InfluxData. I am not sure how common this use case is, but since I
friendlymatthew commented on PR #17076:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17076#issuecomment-3168929125
> Thanks @friendlymatthew
>
> While I can see the rationale behind this change, I'd like to understand
more about why this approach is definitively better than the exis
AdamGS commented on issue #17097:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/17097#issuecomment-3168876916
pretty sure it's a duplicate of #17077, we ran into it with another file
source/format, the only difference as far as I can tell is the reutrn value of
`FileSource::try_with_push
mbutrovich merged PR #2075:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2075
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...
peter-toth commented on PR #2075:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2075#issuecomment-3168788232
Sure, I'm happy to open a follow-up PR next week.
Thanks for the review @mbutrovich, @comphead and @andygrove!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Ser
mbutrovich closed issue #1942: Add support for StringDecode in Spark 4.0.0
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1942
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific com
Adez017 commented on issue #17083:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/17083#issuecomment-3168734031
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
T
codecov-commenter commented on PR #2098:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2098#issuecomment-3168569681
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2098?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_ca
AdamGS opened a new issue, #17097:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/17097
### Describe the bug
When running TPC-DS q39 with filter pushdown enabled, the query fails with
the following error:
```
...
does not satisfy order requirements: [w_warehouse_sk@10 ASC,
coderfender commented on issue #2096:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/2096#issuecomment-3168700788
Apologies for not immediately updating the issue
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and u
coderfender commented on issue #2096:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/2096#issuecomment-3168699849
@CuteChuanChuan I just started working on this too and raised a draft PR :
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2099
--
This is an automated message from
coderfender opened a new pull request, #2099:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2099
## Which issue does this PR close?
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/2096
Closes #.
Implement comet native logic to support rpad(column, column) API in
adriangb commented on issue #17036:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/17036#issuecomment-3168691369
> I think we also need a backport for
>
> * [Add ExecutionPlan::reset_state
#17028](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17028)
https://github.com/apache/data
adriangb opened a new pull request, #17096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17096
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/17036#issuecomment-3168369188
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
BlakeOrth commented on issue #16365:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16365#issuecomment-3168656416
At the end of the day I'm going to be working on some way to get listing
resulted cached, and I'd much rather make those changes here to contribute back
to open source than ke
jonathanc-n commented on PR #16660:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16660#issuecomment-3168485592
Yes PMG should perform better than IE join. they are used to tackle
different things regardless. IE joins are used on multi range while PMG is for
a single range. You can see tha
petern48 commented on PR #2026:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2026#issuecomment-3168459130
Yes, sorry. Just been really busy lately and it's not obvious to me how to
fix the CI failures. I don't think I messed something up about copying things
over, so there's probab
andygrove commented on PR #1946:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1946#issuecomment-3168424899
This PR seems inactive, so moving to draft for now
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
andygrove commented on PR #2026:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2026#issuecomment-3168422096
This PR seems inactive, so moving to draft for now
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
alamb commented on PR #99:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/99#issuecomment-3168412824
This PR is now ready for review
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the speci
alamb commented on PR #99:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/99#issuecomment-3168407554
FYI @XiangpengHao @zhuqi-lucas and @JigaoLuo as you may be interested in
this content
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please l
alamb commented on PR #99:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/99#issuecomment-3168412068
FYI @nuno-faria @shehabgamin @jonathanc-n @zhuqi-lucas and @etseidl as you
are mentioned in the blog post
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to t
alamb commented on PR #16711:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16711#issuecomment-3168404348
🤖: Benchmark completed
Details
```
Comparing HEAD and alamb_test_pushdown
Benchmark clickbench_partitioned.json
---
alamb opened a new pull request, #99:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/99
- Closes https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/17010
This is my attempt at technical evangelism / explanation about when one
would use external indexes and how to do so with DataFusion
alamb commented on PR #98:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/98#issuecomment-3168401674
Will continue work in https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/99
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
alamb closed pull request #98: [BLOG] Using External Indexes and Metadata
Stores to Accelerate Queries on Apache Parquet
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/98
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and u
alamb merged PR #17082:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17082
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
CuteChuanChuan commented on issue #2096:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/2096#issuecomment-3168388686
I would like to work on this issue.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
andygrove opened a new pull request, #2098:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2098
## Which issue does this PR close?
N/A
## Rationale for this change
I'm not sure if this is from a merge conflict or just something I
overlooked, but we
alamb commented on PR #16711:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16711#issuecomment-3168373629
🤖: Benchmark completed
Details
```
Comparing HEAD and alamb_test_pushdown
Benchmark clickbench_pushdown.json
alamb commented on PR #16711:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16711#issuecomment-3168373753
🤖 `./gh_compare_branch.sh` [Benchmark
Script](https://github.com/alamb/datafusion-benchmarking/blob/main/gh_compare_branch.sh)
Running
Linux aal-dev 6.11.0-1016-gcp #16~24.04.1-Ubun
1 - 100 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
