Rachelint commented on PR #15591:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15591#issuecomment-2834179862
This pr may be ready to review now, it is a formal version of #11943 (have
proved the idea promising, 10%~20% faster) with some improvements:
- Almost don't lead any regression w
timsaucer commented on issue #1118:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/1118#issuecomment-2834954709
Duplicate of https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/1116
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
timsaucer commented on PR #1117:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1117#issuecomment-2834958727
Thank you so much. I also have a branch for this that I was going to push
up, but I'll prefer your solution. I do want to add unit tests, so I might push
up what I have on th
goldmedal opened a new pull request, #15879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15879
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #15233 .
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these changes
comphead commented on code in PR #15768:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15768#discussion_r2063914703
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/repartition/mod.rs:
##
@@ -260,33 +260,43 @@ impl BatchPartitioner {
} => {
let idx = *next_
parthchandra commented on code in PR #1683:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1683#discussion_r2064055623
##
common/src/main/java/org/apache/comet/CometSchemaImporter.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
andygrove commented on code in PR #1683:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1683#discussion_r2064062673
##
common/src/main/java/org/apache/comet/CometSchemaImporter.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ *
huaxingao commented on PR #1683:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1683#issuecomment-2835847941
> The scan is a org.apache.iceberg.spark.source.SparkBatchQueryScan which
does not implement SupportsComet
Sorry, I forgot to mention that I have to
[PR](https://github
aharpervc opened a new pull request, #1831:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1831
This PR is a followup to
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1821 to address several
difficulties I had parsing real world SQL files.
There are 3 related en
aharpervc commented on code in PR #1831:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1831#discussion_r2064171122
##
src/ast/mod.rs:
##
@@ -2226,7 +2226,33 @@ impl fmt::Display for IfStatement {
}
}
-/// A block within a [Statement::Case] or [Statement::I
alamb commented on PR #15022:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15022#issuecomment-2835680575
> That is not always the case, some users like Comet for example build
PhysicalPlan directly and execute that and does not use the optimizer at all.
I wonder if we can take a ste
alamb commented on PR #15748:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15748#issuecomment-2835731298
I think the groups accumulator will result in faster performance, not new
functionality.
@shruti2522 maybe you can verify this with `datafusion-cli` and using
`generate_series`
alamb merged PR #15723:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15723
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on PR #15723:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15723#issuecomment-2835794392
Thanks @comphead
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
mbutrovich opened a new pull request, #1686:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1686
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
There's a typo in our fuzz test query generator. `instr` is misspelled as
`in_
alamb commented on issue #1756:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1756#issuecomment-2835916691
@iffyio do you think we are ready to make a release candidate? Specifically
is there any other PR you think we should try and get into this release?
If not, I'
timsaucer commented on PR #15646:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15646#issuecomment-2835919583
@berkaysynnada do you think you'll be able to review soon? I know we wanted
to get this in earlier in the 48 cycle to shake out any bugs since it is a big
change
--
This is an a
alamb commented on PR #1822:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1822#issuecomment-2835918737
I'll plan to merge this PR (after update) when we are happy with the release
contents
- See this comment for more
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/i
Wuerike commented on issue #1257:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/1257#issuecomment-2835923772
Thanks @milenkovicm!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
Wuerike closed issue #1257: How to install ballista python package?
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/issues/1257
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment
alamb commented on PR #1817:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1817#issuecomment-2835929793
Epic
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
alamb commented on PR #1808:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1808#issuecomment-2835931034
Thanks again @iffyio and @aharpervc
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
alamb commented on PR #1818:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1818#issuecomment-2835931909
🚀
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
timsaucer opened a new issue, #15882:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15882
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
Suppose I have an DataFrame in which one column contains arrays. I wish to
be able to apply any scalar expr to each value of that
kazantsev-maksim commented on code in PR #1602:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1602#discussion_r2064138880
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/comet/CometExpressionSuite.scala:
##
@@ -90,6 +90,29 @@ class CometExpressionSuite extends CometTestBase with
Adap
alamb opened a new issue, #15880:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15880
This is my plan this week for reviews, etc. I am putting it here to make it
visible and keep myself organized
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, pl
andygrove commented on code in PR #1647:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1647#discussion_r2063976818
##
docs/source/contributor-guide/benchmarking_macos.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
+
+
+# Comet Benchmarking on macOS
+
+This guide is for setting up TPC-H benchma
andygrove merged PR #1647:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1647
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@
andygrove commented on PR #1647:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1647#issuecomment-2835706462
> are we okay to merge this PR?
Yes, I'll go ahead and merge and we can follow up with change
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond t
andygrove opened a new issue, #1685:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1685
### What is the problem the feature request solves?
We want to avoid making code changes in Comet that cause regressions with
the Iceberg integration.
I would like to add an integra
Rachelint commented on issue #15878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15878#issuecomment-2835790300
My lists (still mainly about aggregation performance, it has falled much
behind duckdb on clickbench...):
- [ ] Push forward #7065 , which has been proved to be really promi
Rachelint opened a new pull request, #13617:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/13617
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these changes tested?
alamb opened a new issue, #15881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15881
### Describe the bug
When invalid arguments are passed to `generate_series` it generates internal
errors rather than normal execution errorrs
Also the errors are not clear how to fix the is
aharpervc commented on code in PR #1831:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1831#discussion_r2064175724
##
src/ast/mod.rs:
##
@@ -3403,6 +3447,10 @@ pub enum Statement {
/// Cursor name
name: Ident,
direction: FetchDirection,
aharpervc commented on code in PR #1831:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1831#discussion_r2064175279
##
src/ast/mod.rs:
##
@@ -3032,6 +3068,14 @@ pub enum Statement {
partition: Option>,
},
/// ```sql
+/// OPEN cursor_name
+
duongcongtoai commented on issue #14554:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14554#issuecomment-2836125284
Yes, that paper basically gave pretty neat skeleton for a decorrelation
framework
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
iffyio commented on issue #1756:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1756#issuecomment-2836134518
@alamb yeah I think we should be good to make a release candidate!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
duongcongtoai commented on issue #5492:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/5492#issuecomment-2836123267
According to the discussions in this issue, i think we can list the
following items to support a subqueries decorrelation framework:
- Unify the optimizor for correlat
UBarney commented on issue #15875:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15875#issuecomment-2834567285
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To un
UBarney opened a new issue, #15875:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15875
### Describe the bug
Executing the SQL query SELECT value, max(value) + min(value) FROM
generate_series(1, 5) GROUP BY value ORDER BY avg(value); results in an error
### To Reproduce
xudong963 commented on issue #14535:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14535#issuecomment-2834586678
> > I bet we are not the only project that would like to have SQLLancer type
support in Rust
>
> That's really cool! Databend will definitely be interesting in building
UBarney opened a new pull request, #15876:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15876
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #15875.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
If `sorts.expr` contains agg_func n
srh commented on PR #15836:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15836#issuecomment-2834607199
@comphead It isn't parser related, it's a bug in evaluation, with this
optimizer.
It seems a query like `"SELECT s.col ILIKE 'A' FROM (SELECT 'a' AS col) AS
s"` will trigger the b
andygrove commented on code in PR #1683:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1683#discussion_r2063690526
##
common/src/main/java/org/apache/comet/CometSchemaImporter.java:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ *
andygrove commented on PR #1683:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1683#issuecomment-2835237562
The scan is a `org.apache.iceberg.spark.source.SparkBatchQueryScan` which
does not implement `SupportsComet`. In fact, I do not see any references to
`SupportsComet` in Iceber
timsaucer merged PR #1117:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1117
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...
timsaucer commented on PR #1117:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1117#issuecomment-2835242970
Actually, it's going to take a while to get all these unit tests written up
so I'll merge your solution in to fix CI and then put my PR up separate.
--
This is an automated
andygrove commented on PR #1683:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1683#issuecomment-2835258164
After modifying Iceberg to make `SparkBatchQueryScan` implement
`SupportsComet`, this now appears to be fully working.
```
scala> spark.sql(s"SELECT * from t1").show(
xudong963 commented on PR #15832:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15832#issuecomment-2835290751
> > You can rebase with main
>
> doe this solve the issue ?
You can open the failed CI and see what's wrong:
```
error[E0599]: no method named `unwrap` found for
timsaucer commented on issue #1118:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/1118#issuecomment-2835314986
Closed by https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1117
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
timsaucer closed issue #1118: main 5a7f638 is broken
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/1118
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe
timsaucer closed issue #1116: Fix regression on main with circular import on
expr
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/1116
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spe
timsaucer commented on issue #1116:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/1116#issuecomment-2835315276
Closed by https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/pull/1117
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
Dandandan commented on PR #15768:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15768#issuecomment-2835325709
@alamb could you run the benchmarks maybe?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
xudong963 opened a new issue, #15877:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15877
https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/proposing-changes-to-your-work-with-pull-requests/keeping-your-pull-request-in-sync-with-the-base-branch
How to set up
xudong963 commented on PR #15852:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15852#issuecomment-2834656400
Github is down, my recent update is delayed
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
daphnenhuch-at commented on issue #15833:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15833#issuecomment-2836826844
> Thanks for the report [@daphnenhuch-at](https://github.com/daphnenhuch-at)
>
> If you want the output sorted in a particular way I think you need to
explicitly ad
comphead commented on issue #15878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15878#issuecomment-2836840621
I'll try to start with https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14510
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
alamb merged PR #15767:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15767
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on PR #15750:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15750#issuecomment-2836855789
Nice
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscri
alamb commented on PR #15773:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15773#issuecomment-2836854794
Thank you so much @chenkovsky and @xudong963
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
alamb commented on PR #15727:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15727#issuecomment-2836864703
What I suggest we should do with this PR is
1. `[#ignore]` the tests that are failing
2. leave a comment with link to the PR / ticket to fix them
3. Merge this PR
--
This
alamb merged PR #15883:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15883
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on code in PR #15836:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15836#discussion_r2064905078
##
datafusion/optimizer/src/simplify_expressions/expr_simplifier.rs:
##
@@ -1606,8 +1606,9 @@ impl TreeNodeRewriter for Simplifier<'_,
S> {
alamb commented on PR #15836:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15836#issuecomment-2836883716
Thank you for this PR @srh
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
comphead commented on code in PR #1680:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1680#discussion_r2064904374
##
native/spark-expr/src/array_funcs/array_repeat.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contribu
maxburke opened a new issue, #15886:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15886
### Describe the bug
Referenced discussion:
https://the-asf.slack.com/archives/C01QUFS30TD/p1745875862723149
Given this table:
```
> create table d1 (ul_node_id string);
```
comphead commented on issue #15886:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15886#issuecomment-2836896989
Simpler test case
ORDER BY in outer query
```
> explain select x.* from (select 1 a union all select null) x order by a
nulls last;
+---+--
maxburke commented on issue #15886:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15886#issuecomment-2836968414
I bisected this to commit 02eab80cd62e02fcb68dee8b99d63aaac680a66c
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Gi
maxburke commented on PR #12003:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/12003#issuecomment-2836969736
I think this change causes this bug:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15886
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, plea
andygrove commented on code in PR #1256:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-ballista/pull/1256#discussion_r2064981773
##
ballista/scheduler/src/state/execution_graph.rs:
##
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ impl ExecutionGraph {
new_tid
}
-pub(crate) fn stages(&sel
qstommyshu commented on PR #15884:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15884#issuecomment-2836975145
Hi @alamb @blaginin ,
This PR is ready for review; I’ll tackle the remaining migrations in
subsequent PRs to keep each set of changes manageable.
--
This is an automated
qstommyshu commented on issue #15396:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15396#issuecomment-2836976596
Hi @alamb and @blaginin ,
Do you mind reopening this issue just to indicate the status of this issue
is not done yet?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
hsiang-c opened a new pull request, #1689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1689
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #. https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1678
## Rationale for this change
Update Rat's exclude files
comphead commented on issue #15886:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15886#issuecomment-2836992611
> I'm getting the results I expect if I revert the changes from that commit
^ in this file: datafusion/sql/src/relation/mod.rs (ie: remove the call to
`optimize_subquery_sort`)
hsiang-c commented on issue #1678:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1678#issuecomment-2836800737
take
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
skyzh commented on issue #15878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15878#issuecomment-2836799420
I think #14595 is in a decent shape and could be merged :) Though it cannot
unnest all queries and might produce wrong result for some lateral joins, that
would be a good starting
alamb opened a new issue, #15885:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15885
# What I see (what problem we are trying to solve)
DataFusion's current join implementations are fairly basic. They are
functional enough to run TPCH and TPC-DS, but lack other features such as
large
alamb commented on issue #14554:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14554#issuecomment-2836816251
- I am trying to organize a join task force for planning joins / subqueries:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15885
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Gi
GitHub user daphnenhuch-at added a comment to the discussion: How does 'sort'
interact with record batches?
That doesn't fix this problem unfortunately. When I swap the order I still get
the record batch starting with 8192 first
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/discussions/1
alamb commented on issue #5483:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/5483#issuecomment-2836816535
- I am trying to organize a join task force for planning joins / subqueries:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15885
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
alamb commented on issue #3843:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/3843#issuecomment-2836816875
- I am trying to organize a join task force for planning joins / subqueries:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15885
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
alamb commented on issue #5492:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/5492#issuecomment-2836818904
- I am trying to organize a join task force for planning joins / subqueries:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15885
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
alamb commented on issue #15878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15878#issuecomment-2836821370
> I think [#14595](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14595) is in a
decent shape and could be merged :) Though it cannot unnest all queries and
might produce wrong result
alamb commented on issue #15878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15878#issuecomment-2836819606
- I am also trying to help organize a join task force for planning joins /
subqueries: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15885
--
This is an automated message from the
parthchandra commented on code in PR #1680:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1680#discussion_r2064867088
##
native/spark-expr/src/array_funcs/array_repeat.rs:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more cont
comphead commented on PR #1672:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1672#issuecomment-2837020381
are we okay to merge it?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the sp
akurmustafa commented on issue #15833:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15833#issuecomment-2837020145
Sort function in `Datafusion` accepts the vector. By this way, you can pass
the desired lexicographical ordering such as
(`.sort(vec
Running
Linux aal-dev 6.11.0-1013-gcp #13~24.04.1-Ubun
alamb commented on code in PR #15836:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15836#discussion_r2065170350
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/strings.slt:
##
@@ -115,6 +115,12 @@ p1
p1e1
p1m1e1
+query T rowsort
Review Comment:
In case anyone is curious, without
alamb commented on code in PR #15783:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15783#discussion_r2065171783
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/joins/hash_join.rs:
##
@@ -86,6 +86,10 @@ use datafusion_physical_expr_common::physical_expr::fmt_sql;
use futures::{ready, Stream,
alamb commented on code in PR #15852:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15852#discussion_r2065176521
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/aggregates/mod.rs:
##
@@ -941,49 +994,15 @@ impl ExecutionPlan for AggregateExec {
}
fn statistics(&self) -> Result {
-
1 - 100 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
