@b4n you are a life saver, your next beer is on me 🍻
I didn't realize git had garbage collection, I'll be sure to `git fetch` next
time
This PR is back on track now 😄
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins/pull/1221#issuecomment-147558177
@asifamin13 pushed 1 commit.
50ae4036e73836f54a37d4636d2ecfc448eeac22 Bracket Colors
--
View it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins/pull/1221/files/e8a1d9845fa2a6976420a678df812aaa53207614..50ae4036e73836f54a37d4636d2ecfc448eeac22
You are receiving this because you are subscribed
The weekly rebuild of the CI container image for the Mingw64 builds works fine.
But the previous image versions are kept as untagged images in the container
registry.
This workflow should remove all untagged image versions except that last five
ones.
It is schedules weekly two hours after the im
@eht16 pushed 4 commits.
db7b0d8a03e644977b9187489f23c03c760fd53f CI: Add Windows build
ad222a5667f6607213e6ada7c0d58832a57bada2 debug...
58baa1d0e89e1aadec067c857622adc3463983fb CI: Use "JOBS" environment variable
for make if set
43f1b202b637c81cb5af6a6bf2f1e4728a8fc6c6 CI: Fix copied Geany
I just noticed in the CI workflow for the "traditional" Autotools
based jobs, we did not specify "-j" for parallel job execution for
the main "make" call to build all the sources.
We did however for "make check" and "make distcheck".
If there is no reason for not using "-j 2", this PR adds it an
Well, Geanylua would not be allowed to depend on an external plugin, although
of course you can do whatever you want for yourself.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/discussions/3431#discussioncomment-5358347
You are receiving this because you ar
https://github.com/xiota/geany-preview
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/discussions/3431#discussioncomment-5358317
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
BTW which plugin did you mean "Preview"? I can't see any such in Geany or
Geany-Plugins?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/discussions/3431#discussioncomment-5358152
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
> OK, so does that mean that if both plugins are activated in the Plugin
> Manager and stay activated in the Plugin Manager, that a plugin can have
> access to the functions of the other plugin?
I don't think so, plugins are shared objects, but are loaded
`G_MODULE_BIND_LOCAL` which means their
>Short answer, no, there is no way of guaranteeing that another plugin is
>loaded and remains loaded. The user can unload at any time.
OK, so does that mean that if both plugins are activated in the `Plugin
Manager` and stay activated in the `Plugin Manager`, that a plugin can have
access to th
10 matches
Mail list logo
