Closed #4302 as completed.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/4302#event-17543740221
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
tekstryder left a comment (geany/geany#4302)
Sorry for the noise.
Built git master against the X11-less GTK3 and all is well.
Closing.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/4302#issuecomment-2855830025
You are receiving this because you ar
tekstryder created an issue (geany/geany#4302)
In a native Wayland session environment (no X11 or Xwayland), Geany has been
working great for a long while!
However, when using GTK3, compiled without the X11 backend, Geany fails to
launch.
```
May 05 08:52:54 geany.desktop[659270]: /usr/bin/gea
> @tekstryder Does #4071 fix your problem?
Sorry for the delay.
Indeed, https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/4071 allows me to disable the Gnome
extension and use Mutter's default focus-stealing prevention without issue now.
This is awesome. Thanks so much!
--
Reply to this email directly or
Hmm, okay. Perhaps I lack some fundamental understanding here. If so I
apologize for the noise.
Going back to the original Wayland protocol
[merge](https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/-/merge_requests/50)
itself, we see it's pretty toolkit-agnostic at this point:
- Qt clie
Thank you for the rationale you explained here.
As an example... I don't use chrome/chromium (also a GTK3 app) as my browser,
but it was big news this year when they [started supporting XDG
Activation](https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/5280365),
allowing links from other
>From the OP, specific to the use case of Geany and Nautilus under Gnome...
>this is mutter's focus-stealing prevention at work.
I found this still-open issue here as I was searching for a feature request
with Geany to implement the [XDG Activation
protocol](https://wayland.app/protocols/xdg-ac
> why is right_ptr missing, or did they forget that one?
Possibly, but there are other [more hotly
debated](https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/6337) one's
missing/undecided too, such as left_ptr_watch and various dnd.
I only know enough to see that right-ptr was axed in the [initial
c
Thank you for looking into this and your through explanation!
> if it doesn't get in a release should not appear in stable distros.
No, that "compromise"
[merged](https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/adwaita-icon-theme/-/merge_requests/65)
during the past dev cycle, and was included in the tagged rel
> IIRC it uses a right pointed cursor over the left margin
Ah, you're right (pun intended). Still unclear what that intends to indicate,
but that's where the `right_ptr` attempt occurs.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/3809#issuecomme
> we don't don't ship or set icon themes
No, but you utilize cursors.
I suppose this is more a request for Geany supporting CSS xcursor
standards[1][2] than finding icon themes that support esoteric cursors.
I'm not sure what the intended use of `right_ptr` is by Geany. What is that
supposed
- Arch Linux | Kernel 6.7.11
- Gnome-shell | Mutter 46.0
- Wayland (*meson_options: xwayland=false*)
- `Geany 2.0`
- Gtk 3.24.41
Seeing these errors since Gnome 46.
```
Mar 30 08:00:22 geany[10386]: Unable to load right_ptr from the cursor theme
Mar 30 08:00:22 geany[10386]: g_object_unref: asser
12 matches
Mail list logo
