Closing as it's working as expected. I'm open to a PR that displays a
module-level scope (as suggested by @elextr).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Closed #1484.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1484#event-1554967186
@kugel-: please close this.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1484#issuecomment-378372697
I don't know about Perl, but in many languages a file is not a scope, so
"unknown" is more correct, and in other languages the scope is a module or
package name that derives from the filename, eg Java and in others its derived
from the path eg Python. So unless someone is going to make the
I agree with @LarsGit223, will close this in a week unless somebody objects.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1484#issuecomment-373994325
Sorry, but I voted for not changing this.
IMHO the scope shows the context inside of the file. And the filename is
already shown in the title of the tab. So I think it shouldn't be duplicated in
the scope field.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to
Hello.
One the status bar where one can see the line number, column, selection, etc.
there is a value called Scope. When I am within a perl subroutine the scope is
the subroutine. However, if the cursor is not within a subroutine, the scope
would be the whole file but not unknown in my
