Ok, I don't want to argue about this.
Also I don't know enough about the "Windows trust". If it does work
automagically, it's fine. If not, we probably will receive a couple of bug
reports.
Don't get me wrong, not using TLS is no better.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed
> This is what I would doubt. Do you have any reference on this? The pasted
> link is just the code but I could not find any hint about included
> certificates. So I would assume "glib-networking" needs external certificate
> resources as well (which is totally fine IMO).
If you use the
> > On Linux there's usually a central cert-db, but not sure there's such on
> > Windows.
>
> I'm pretty sure that's not true.
Or it just depends on how you define "central cert-db". Usually there is a
system wide certificate store with common public root certificates and this
store is
> On Linux there's usually a central cert-db, but not sure there's such on
> Windows.
I'm pretty sure that's not true.
> What's the recommended way to handle TLS validation on Windows?
The recommended way is to do nothing. Just use the default GTlsDatabase.
[That's implemented
It's quite trivial to change GeniusPaste to call
`soup_session_new_with_options()` instead of the current
`soup_session_async_new_with_options()`, the resulting object is still the
`SoupSession`, and it seems that the plugin is in fact doing a **synchronous**
send. We can implement the
Hi, geniuspaste.c does not appear to be enabling TLS certificate verification
on the SoupSessionAsync object it creates. [You have to do this manually when
using the deprecated
