Hi.
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 10:10:20AM -0700, Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor) wrote:
>
> Giuliano P Procida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Easier said than done... it was a while before I realised
> > that removing the fflush and typing make just wasn't going to
> > hack it. This is because hsc
Giuliano P Procida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> No improvement, I'm afraid.
>
> On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 01:16:01AM -0700, Sigbjorn Finne
> (Intl Vendor) wrote:
> > The fflush in shutdownHaskell() should not be required any longer -
> > the behaviour it purports to work around is a non-issu
No improvement, I'm afraid.
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 01:16:01AM -0700, Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor) wrote:
> The fflush in shutdownHaskell() should not be required any longer -
> the behaviour it purports to work around is a non-issue to us now.
>
> Removing it and recompiling the RTS you're link
Giuliano P Procida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 12:33:39PM -0700, Sigbjorn Finne
> (Intl Vendor) wrote:
> > It looks sensible, shutdownHaskell() is the last thing the
> > RTS calls before exiting. Could it be that fflush() is failing
> > since stdout hasn't been used
On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 12:33:39PM -0700, Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor) wrote:
> It looks sensible, shutdownHaskell() is the last thing the
> RTS calls before exiting. Could it be that fflush() is failing
> since stdout hasn't been used? Does the following work OK
They both work without trouble. I
