> If `fromInt' is necessary as an extension, I believe, it shouldn't
> appear unless -fglasgow-exts is specified.
Assuming that GHC includes an appropriate default implementation for
fromInt (via fromInteger), does it make any difference?
Alastair
Both GHC 4.04 and Hugs 98 agree on violating the Haskell 98
definition by including `fromInt' into `Num' and `toInt'
into `Integral'. GHC's `Prelude.lhs' says in the export list
Num((+), (-), (*), negate, abs, signum, fromInteger, fromInt{-glaExt-}),
[...]
Integral(quot, rem, div, mod,
Mircea Draghicescu:
> The other question still remains: is this 4.03 or 4.04?
Having recently dl'd the same thing, looks a lot like ghc-4.03 to me...
I presume there's not a binary build for 4.04 (at least, not yet).
Two oddities I've noticed with ghc-4.03, win+cygnus binary build:
The -ansi flag makes gcc go berserk on the generated code. I stopped.
'getEnv "PATH"' returns, not the value of PATH, but the whole environment.
Which is also handy, but not what I understood the report to specify,
and not wha
