"Simon Marlow" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
Thanks, the debugging hints helped a lot (which tutorial did I miss
this time? :)
No tutorials, but it has been posted a couple of times on the GHC lists.
The material should really go in the GHC commentary
Hi Simon,
I think I've made most of the changes in the mangler to get it to work with
gcc 2.95.2 on HP-UX (only about 6 lines). One question however, the *_info
is inverted and placed in the code section I presume so that its address is
identical to the entry point for an associated function. Is
I reconfigured gmp so that it falls back to the pure C implementation,
and the problem disappeared. Is the gmp stuff in ghc maintained at
Glasgow, or are you syncing your code with the official distribution?
It's an almost exact copy of the official distribution, with a few minor
I reconfigured gmp so that it falls back to the pure C
implementation,
and the problem disappeared. Is the gmp stuff in ghc
maintained at
Glasgow, or are you syncing your code with the official
distribution?
It's an almost exact copy of the official distribution,
with a few
Hi Andy,
I think I've made most of the changes in the mangler to get
it to work with
gcc 2.95.2 on HP-UX (only about 6 lines). One question
however, the *_info
is inverted and placed in the code section I presume so that
its address is
identical to the entry point for an associated
