On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 05:27:43PM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
'(' exp(i+1) op(a,i) ')'
'(' op(a,i) exp(i+1) ')'
'(' lexp(i) op(l,i) ')'
'(' op(r,i) rexp(i) ')'
And for the sake of fewer ambiguities, replace each op(a,i)
with op(n,i)
in the existing two
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:27:43 -, Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze:
I think it would be better to change the syntax to match the text rather
than the other way around: clearly sections like (++a++b) are desirable.
I would even argue that (a++b++) should mean \x - a++b++x
Of course Haskell
