Simon Marlow wrote:
> [...] but 'make install' on Windows is very rare anyway (most people
> just install from the .msi or run it from the build tree).
But a 'make install' is not so rare if you took the trouble of
installing half a dozen utilities to do a successful 'make'. :-)
> I'd only be guess
Hi Simon
Simon> Yes, this is a known bug,
Sorry that I'm not perfectly aware of everything going
on with Template Haskell.
Simon> but thank you for reporting it
Simon> anyway. I'm going to fix it as part of my next sweep though.
Thank you very much. I'm happy to know that it is rea
Yes, this is a known bug, but thank you for reporting it anyway. I'm
going to fix it as part of my next sweep though.
I enclose a message that gives a workaround.
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
| Behalf Of Ch. A. Herrmann
| Sent: 05 Jun
"Simon Marlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm now `GHC.Conc.forkProcess`ing only from the initial
> > thread, and all
> > seems well. Thanks for the suggestion!
> >
> > Any idea when `forkProcess` might get fixed? Don't hurry on my
> > account; I'm just curious.
>
> There's a comment
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 08:00:00PM +1000, Bernard James POPE wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I seem to remember reading about this before, but I can't
> find it, so I'm sorry if I'm repeating a known bug report.
>
> It seems that -fglasgow-exts has trouble with (##) as an
> operator:
>
>module Main whe
I'm afraid you are stuck with this. With -fglasgow-exts you do lose
some existing syntax (to give space for the new stuff) and this is one
such instance.
(# and #) are new punctuation for -fglasgow-exts
We do not have a place in the manual that collects all the syntax that
-fglasgow-ext
Hi all,
I seem to remember reading about this before, but I can't
find it, so I'm sorry if I'm repeating a known bug report.
It seems that -fglasgow-exts has trouble with (##) as an
operator:
module Main where
f ## x = f x
main = print $ (##) id True
It doesn't like the prefix use of