On 26 May 2004 06:58, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
Dear GHC team,
In my previous letter I wrote about a bug-like message in
cvs ghc-6-2-branch of May 24
(the fragments of this letter are appended).
And in this situation GHC also responds badly if
On 25 May 2004 12:58, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
Dear GHC team,
I have tested (on somewhat 90%) the cvs ghc-6-2-branch of May 24.
It looks almost correct for DoCon.
Still I pretend to report the two bugs, so far.
1: (wrote earlier) is on negative number of bytes shown by
`:set
On Thu, 2004-05-27 at 11:06, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
A crude but simple story could be:
with -fth, switch off fine-grain dependency tracking
instead just use the modification dates on the files
Would that be better?
Too much recompilation is better than too little in that at
Bugs item #960029, was opened at 2004-05-25 12:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by stefanheimann
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=960029group_id=8032
Category: Compiler
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority:
