Bugs item #1206426, was opened at 2005-05-21 23:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sigbjorn
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108032&aid=1206426&group_id=8032
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment th
Bugs item #1186911, was opened at 2005-04-20 20:25
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by simonpj
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108032&aid=1186911&group_id=8032
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thr
Bugs item #1213876, was opened at 2005-06-02 23:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by simonpj
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108032&aid=1213876&group_id=8032
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thr
Bugs item #1245810, was opened at 2005-07-27 08:32
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by simonpj
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108032&aid=1245810&group_id=8032
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thr
Bugs item #1256785, was opened at 2005-08-11 15:05
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108032&aid=1256785&group_id=8032
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of
"Simon Marlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On 11 August 2005 01:18, John Meacham wrote:
Why do we set file descriptors to nonblocking mode anyway if they are
waited on by a select. there shouldn't be a need to use both
It avoids an extra system call per read(), i.e. a single read() instead
of
Bugs item #1251699, was opened at 2005-08-04 09:03
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by simonmar
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108032&aid=1251699&group_id=8032
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment th
Bugs item #1251699, was opened at 2005-08-04 11:03
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ggd
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108032&aid=1251699&group_id=8032
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
Bugs item #1251699, was opened at 2005-08-04 09:03
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by simonmar
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108032&aid=1251699&group_id=8032
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment th
On 11 August 2005 01:18, John Meacham wrote:
> Why do we set file descriptors to nonblocking mode anyway if they are
> waited on by a select. there shouldn't be a need to use both
It avoids an extra system call per read(), i.e. a single read() instead
of select() + read(). And there's a slight c
On 11 August 2005 04:05, Andre Pang wrote:
> On 23/07/2005, at 12:12 AM, Gregory Wright wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to get caballized package deployment working on Mac OS X.
>>
>> However, trying to build a package using runhaskell results in:
>>
>>
>> crossroads-able> runhaskell Setup.hs configure
Ah I see now. The underlying problem is that GHC's "no need to
recompile" check takes account of changes in the source file, but does
not take into account changes in the flags.
So it skipped recompiling Test2, but it should have recompiled it to
make the -main-is take effect. Failing to do so g
Bugs item #1256533, was opened at 2005-08-11 09:06
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108032&aid=1256533&group_id=8032
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of
Bugs item #635718, was opened at 2002-11-08 23:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ajk
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108032&aid=635718&group_id=8032
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
i
> I can't reproduce this failure:
>
> ~/scratch > cat ModName/Main.hs
> module ModName.Main where
> main=print "hello"
> ~/scratch > ghc -o out --make ModName/Main.hs -main-is ModName.Main.main
> Chasing modules from: ModName/Main.hs
> Skipping ModName.Main ( ModName/Main.hs, ModName/Main.o
Bugs item #635718, was opened at 2002-11-08 21:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by simonmar
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108032&aid=635718&group_id=8032
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thre
Bugs item #635718, was opened at 2002-11-08 23:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ajk
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108032&aid=635718&group_id=8032
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
i
17 matches
Mail list logo
