Re: [GHC] #1282: binary package wants uncheckedShift functions to be exported from base

2007-04-22 Thread GHC
#1282: binary package wants uncheckedShift functions to be exported from base +--- Reporter: Isaac Dupree| Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal |

Re: [GHC] #1284: GHC 6.6 does not compile on Slackware 11.0 linux

2007-04-22 Thread GHC
#1284: GHC 6.6 does not compile on Slackware 11.0 linux --+- Reporter: guest | Owner: Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal| Milestone: Compone

Re: [GHC] #1232: generalise runhaskell to support arbitrary file names, not just those with .{l}hs extensions

2007-04-22 Thread GHC
#1232: generalise runhaskell to support arbitrary file names, not just those with .{l}hs extensions -+-- Reporter: Frederik | Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new

Re: [GHC] #1232: generalise runhaskell to support arbitrary file names, not just those with .{l}hs extensions

2007-04-22 Thread Stefan O'Rear
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 06:53:44PM +0100, Frederik Eaton wrote: > On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 08:44:44AM -0700, Stefan O'Rear wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 12:02:19PM +0100, Frederik Eaton wrote: > > > By the way, I replied to this via email because I can't figure out how > > > to annotate the bug

Re: [GHC] #1232: generalise runhaskell to support arbitrary file names, not just those with .{l}hs extensions

2007-04-22 Thread Frederik Eaton
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 08:44:44AM -0700, Stefan O'Rear wrote: > On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 12:02:19PM +0100, Frederik Eaton wrote: > > By the way, I replied to this via email because I can't figure out how > > to annotate the bug anymore. I'm rather stumped... I thought email > > replies might automa

Re: [GHC] #1282: binary package wants uncheckedShift functions to be exported from base

2007-04-22 Thread GHC
#1282: binary package wants uncheckedShift functions to be exported from base +--- Reporter: Isaac Dupree| Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal |

Re: [GHC] #1232: generalise runhaskell to support arbitrary file names, not just those with .{l}hs extensions

2007-04-22 Thread Stefan O'Rear
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 12:02:19PM +0100, Frederik Eaton wrote: > By the way, I replied to this via email because I can't figure out how > to annotate the bug anymore. I'm rather stumped... I thought email > replies might automatically become associated with the bug. I'm pretty sure they won't. 1

Re: [GHC] #1232: generalise runhaskell to support arbitrary file names, not just those with .{l}hs extensions

2007-04-22 Thread Frederik Eaton
By the way, I replied to this via email because I can't figure out how to annotate the bug anymore. I'm rather stumped... I thought email replies might automatically become associated with the bug. Frederik On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 01:04:52PM +0100, Frederik Eaton wrote: > Hi Igloo, > > We are no