Re: [GHC] #1496: Newtypes and type families combine to produce inconsistent FC(X) axiom sets

#1496: Newtypes and type families combine to produce inconsistent FC(X) axiom sets +--- Reporter: sorear |Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Prio

Re: [GHC] #1496: Newtypes and type families combine to produce inconsistent FC(X) axiom sets

#1496: Newtypes and type families combine to produce inconsistent FC(X) axiom sets +--- Reporter: sorear |Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Prio

Re: [GHC] #1496: Newtypes and type families combine to produce inconsistent FC(X) axiom sets

#1496: Newtypes and type families combine to produce inconsistent FC(X) axiom sets +--- Reporter: sorear |Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Prio

[GHC] #1497: Rebinding (:) -- built-in syntax, or just another constructor?

#1497: Rebinding (:) -- built-in syntax, or just another constructor? +--- Reporter: dons | Owner: Type: bug| Status: new Priority: low

Re: [GHC] #832: GMP needs to be updated

#832: GMP needs to be updated ---+ Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: igloo Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: high|Milestone: 6.8 Co

Re: [GHC] #1282: binary package wants uncheckedShift functions to be exported from base

#1282: binary package wants uncheckedShift functions to be exported from base ---+ Reporter: Isaac Dupree|Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: high|

Re: stg_ap_pp_ret

Hi Simon, No time to try to reproduce it, I'm preparing for a conference ;) I haven't seen the bug recently, but ... tangentially I was musing that if someone could devote some time to turning the GHC internal error message (which I've seen on over a hundred occasions, I'm sure) into a tool that

Re: stg_ap_pp_ret

Frederik Eaton wrote: I've been seeing this a lot: : internal error: stg_ap_pp_ret (GHC version 6.6.1 for i386_unknown_linux) Sometimes it seems to go away when I remove .o and .hi files and recompile, but it keeps coming back when I make edits and/or compile with different optimisation op

Re: [GHC] #1282: binary package wants uncheckedShift functions to be exported from base

#1282: binary package wants uncheckedShift functions to be exported from base ---+ Reporter: Isaac Dupree|Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: high|

Re: [GHC] #1495: newtype fixpoint sends the compiler into an infinite loop

#1495: newtype fixpoint sends the compiler into an infinite loop -+-- Reporter: guest |Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|Milestone: Comp

Re: [GHC] #1495: newtype fixpoint sends the compiler into an infinite loop

#1495: newtype fixpoint sends the compiler into an infinite loop -+-- Reporter: guest |Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|Milestone: Comp

Re: [GHC] #1452: Modules omitted from a .cabal file are not reported, but result in a non-functional library

#1452: Modules omitted from a .cabal file are not reported, but result in a non- functional library --+- Reporter: guest |Owner: guest Type: bug| Status: ass

Re: [GHC] #736: Allowing any newtype of the IO monad to be used in FFI and extra optional entry point

#736: Allowing any newtype of the IO monad to be used in FFI and extra optional entry point --+- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|Owner: simonpj Type: feature request| Stat

Re: [GHC] #1489: Impossible happened

#1489: Impossible happened --+- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: Type: bug| Status: closed Priority: highest|Milestone: Component: GHC

Re: [GHC] #1274: Add a MonadState instance for the Parsec monad

#1274: Add a MonadState instance for the Parsec monad --+- Reporter: mux|Owner: Type: proposal | Status: new Priority: normal |Mil

Re: [GHC] #1494: panic! (the 'impossible' happened)

#1494: panic! (the 'impossible' happened) --+- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: Type: bug| Status: closed Priority: highest|Milestone:

Re: [GHC] #1494: panic! (the 'impossible' happened)

#1494: panic! (the 'impossible' happened) --+- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: Type: bug| Status: reopened Priority: highest|Milestone:

RE: [GHC] #1491: Extension RecordWildCards is broken

| It didn't reuse the same Name. When a C{..} pattern was found it was expanded (very early) in expandDotDot by | looking up the children of the constructor and making a new RdrName for each field. No C{..} ever reached | rnPat. | But I guess there was something about this you didn't like. It

Re: [GHC] #1489: Impossible happened

#1489: Impossible happened --+- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: Type: bug| Status: new Priority: highest|Milestone: Component: GHC

Re: [GHC] #1494: panic! (the 'impossible' happened)

#1494: panic! (the 'impossible' happened) --+- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: Type: bug| Status: closed Priority: highest|Milestone:

Re: [GHC] #1491: Extension RecordWildCards is broken

#1491: Extension RecordWildCards is broken -+-- Reporter: guest |Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|Milestone: Component: Compiler |