Re: [GHC] #3740: 6.8.2: Cannot configure under Cygwin

2009-12-09 Thread GHC
#3740: 6.8.2: Cannot configure under Cygwin --+- Reporter: jaalto | Owner: Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal | Milestone:

Re: [GHC] #3740: 6.8.2: Cannot configure under Cygwin

2009-12-09 Thread GHC
#3740: 6.8.2: Cannot configure under Cygwin --+- Reporter: jaalto | Owner: Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal | Milestone:

Re: [GHC] #110: Cygwin binaries

2009-12-09 Thread GHC
#110: Cygwin binaries --+- Reporter: fizzgig | Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: _|_ C

Re: [GHC] #3677: Optimizer creates stack overflow on filtered CAF

2009-12-09 Thread GHC
#3677: Optimizer creates stack overflow on filtered CAF +--- Reporter: jpet | Owner: simonpj Type: bug| Status: closed Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.12.2

Re: [GHC] #3330: Type checker hangs

2009-12-09 Thread GHC
#3330: Type checker hangs --+- Reporter: MartijnVanSteenbergen| Owner: chak Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Mil

Re: [GHC] #3664: Ghc eats tremendous heaps of RAM in -prof build (highlighting-kate)

2009-12-09 Thread GHC
#3664: Ghc eats tremendous heaps of RAM in -prof build (highlighting-kate) ---+ Reporter: slyfox| Owner: Type: bug | Status: new

Re: [GHC] #3736: GHC specialising instead of inlining

2009-12-09 Thread GHC
#3736: GHC specialising instead of inlining --+- Reporter: guest| Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Miles

Re: [GHC] #3740: 6.8.2: Cannot configure under Cygwin

2009-12-09 Thread GHC
#3740: 6.8.2: Cannot configure under Cygwin --+- Reporter: jaalto | Owner: Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal | Milestone:

[GHC] #3740: 6.8.2: Cannot configure under Cygwin

2009-12-09 Thread GHC
#3740: 6.8.2: Cannot configure under Cygwin ---+ Reporter: jaalto | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: Build System

[GHC] #3739: ghc-cabal mishandles relative paths in arguments

2009-12-09 Thread GHC
#3739: ghc-cabal mishandles relative paths in arguments -+-- Reporter: asuffield | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal| Compo

Re: [GHC] #3637: ./configure doesn't understand Gentoo's build/host/target

2009-12-09 Thread GHC
#3637: ./configure doesn't understand Gentoo's build/host/target --+- Reporter: kolmodin | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: high

Re: [GHC] #3586: Initialisation of unboxed arrays is too slow

2009-12-09 Thread GHC
#3586: Initialisation of unboxed arrays is too slow --+- Reporter: simonpj | Owner: simonmar Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: high

Re: [GHC] #427: Random.StdGen slowness

2009-12-09 Thread GHC
#427: Random.StdGen slowness --+- Reporter: remit| Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal |

Re: [GHC] #3733: When I loaded a file and ran it, it gave a message asking me to submit a bug

2009-12-09 Thread GHC
#3733: When I loaded a file and ran it, it gave a message asking me to submit a bug ---+ Reporter: vtrajan | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|

Re: [GHC] #3714: Improve error message if an associated family declaration has excess parameters

2009-12-09 Thread GHC
#3714: Improve error message if an associated family declaration has excess parameters ---+ Reporter: simonpj | Owner: chak Type: bug | Status: new Priorit

Re: [GHC] #3714: Improve error message if an associated family declaration has excess parameters

2009-12-09 Thread Stefan Holdermans
Simon, type family T3 {|f|} e :: * Indeed. But do you want to use that syntax for class parameters too? That would be a big change class C {|a|} where Well... That would be the most consistent then. But... it looks weird. And it breaks code, of course. One could argue of

RE: [GHC] #3714: Improve error message if an associated family declaration has excess parameters

2009-12-09 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
Indeed. But do you want to use that syntax for class parameters too? That would be a big change class C {|a|} where S | -Original Message- | From: Stefan Holdermans [mailto:ste...@cs.uu.nl] | Sent: 09 December 2009 08:42 | To: glasgow-haskell-bugs@haskell.org | Cc: Simon

Re: [GHC] #3714: Improve error message if an associated family declaration has excess parameters

2009-12-09 Thread Stefan Holdermans
Simon, Regarding distinguishing between type indices and parameters, you suggested: type family T3 f !e :: * -- The ! indicates a type parameter (not an index) I'd rather have indices, rather than parameters, explicated by mean of syntax. This seems more consistent with ordinar

Re: [GHC] #3714: Improve error message if an associated family declaration has excess parameters

2009-12-09 Thread GHC
#3714: Improve error message if an associated family declaration has excess parameters ---+ Reporter: simonpj | Owner: chak Type: bug | Status: new Priorit