In message <8B57882C41A0D1118F7100805F9F68B50C44A904@RED-MSG-45>, Simon Marlow
writes:
>
>> Just ran it with 2.8.1; crashes _sooner_. Much sooner. Like before
>> anything else happens. You want me to send output again?
>
>This is because of a bug in GHC 4.02 (I mentioned in my earlier message
In message <8B57882C41A0D1118F7100805F9F68B50C44A902@RED-MSG-45>, Simon Marlow
writes:
>
>> Given that I didn't compile this (I downloaded the binaries
>> from the GHC
>> site), I'm not sure how my version of gcc is relevant.
>>
>> Doesn't this version of ghc go to assembly?
>
>No, it goes via
In message <8B57882C41A0D1118F7100805F9F68B50C44A8FB@RED-MSG-45>, Simon Marlow
writes:
>> Note that I'm barely able to write Haskell at all, so this may not be
>> very good. All that's required to generate the bug is to run with no
>> args. Or any args. Whatever. It does _NOT_ appear to be a
Note that I'm barely able to write Haskell at all, so this may not be
very good. All that's required to generate the bug is to run with no
args. Or any args. Whatever. It does _NOT_ appear to be a GC
error. Anyways, here's the code:
- - - -
\documentclass{article}
\u
In message <8B57882C41A0D1118F7100805F9F68B50C44A8EC@RED-MSG-45>, Simon Marlow
writes:
>> Hi all! I don't read this mailing list, so please copy me on
>> responses
>> if you think I need to see them.
>>
>> Having some problems (all fixable) with the Solaris 4.2 GHC make.
>>
>> 1. Sun's cc ca