As I was not involved in that discussion, why should the keyword "with" not
be introduced?
Just curious,
Erik
- Original Message -
From: "Alastair Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April
tchlevel 0
Effective command line: -v -o main
Ineffective C pre-processor:
echo '{-# LINE 1 "main.hs" -}' > /tmp/ghc1026.cpp && cat main.hs >>
/tmp/ghc1026.cpp
deleting... /tmp/ghc1026.cpp
rm -f /tmp/ghc1026*
bash-2.02$
==
Erik Meijer
c! (the `impossible' happened):
lookupBindC:no info!
for: B1
(probably: data dependencies broken by an optimisation pass)
static binds for:
local binds for:
cZx
Please report it as a compiler bug to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----
Erik
>It would be wonderful if both GHC and Hugs would use the same module
>structure (for ST) and the same names.
Make sure both use lazy state threads!
Erik
