On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:52:08PM +0200, David Waern wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if we can do Haddock fixes for 6.10.3. Can we?
No, you are right. 6.10.3 will have very few changes, to minimise the
amount of breakage that can occur. We really don't want to have to do a
6.10.4 :-)
Thanks
Ian
On 28/04/2009 16:52, David Waern wrote:
2009/4/28 Sven Panne:
Am Samstag, 25. April 2009 14:48:03 schrieb Sven Panne:
Currently I am unable to make inter-module links (of the form
'Foo.Bar.baz') work with the Haddock shipped with GHC 6.10.2. [...]
Until a few moments ago, I wasn't aware of the
2009/4/28 Sven Panne :
> Am Samstag, 25. April 2009 14:48:03 schrieb Sven Panne:
>> Currently I am unable to make inter-module links (of the form
>> 'Foo.Bar.baz') work with the Haddock shipped with GHC 6.10.2. [...]
>
> Until a few moments ago, I wasn't aware of the fact that Haddock has a trac
>
Am Samstag, 25. April 2009 14:48:03 schrieb Sven Panne:
> Currently I am unable to make inter-module links (of the form
> 'Foo.Bar.baz') work with the Haddock shipped with GHC 6.10.2. [...]
Until a few moments ago, I wasn't aware of the fact that Haddock has a trac
for itself nowadays, so I guess
Currently I am unable to make inter-module links (of the form 'Foo.Bar.baz')
work with the Haddock shipped with GHC 6.10.2. The library documentation on
haskell.org has the same problem, see e.g. the last paragraphs of
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Control-
Except
