> Hi. I have just downloaded and installed (in-place)
> ghc-4.01. I tried testing it by compiling the sample program
>
> main = putStr "Hello, world!\n"
>
> with
>
> ghc -o hello Main.hs
>
> This compiles without complaint (only an observation that
> "ghc: module version changed to 1; reas
Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote,
> > Hi. I have just downloaded and installed (in-place)
> > ghc-4.01. I tried testing it by compiling the sample program
> >
> > main = putStr "Hello, world!\n"
> >
> > with
> >
> > ghc -o hello Main.hs
> >
> > This compiles without complaint (only
It looks like some platforms have problems with memory mangement. I observed
a similar problem with the Win32 binary, too. On Windows NT everything is
OK. Using Windows 95/98 (on my home machine) I have got the message:
getMBlocks: MapViewOfFileEx failed with: 487
TEST.EXE: fatal error: G
Hi,
Herbert Graeber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes:
>
> It looks like some platforms have problems with memory
> mangement. I observed a similar problem with the Win32
> binary, too. On Windows NT everything is OK.
> Using Windows 95/98 (on my home machine) I have got the
> message:
>
>
> Is N very high? If not, why not just allocate N - 1 bytes
> too much and then advance the pointer to the memory block to
> the next N-byte boundary?
N is a megabyte by default. I don't like doing too many mmaps, especially
mmaping more memory than we need, because some operating systems tend
Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>[...]
>The base address is still 0x5000 though - if this
>turns out to interact badly with other allocators, we'll elaborate on
>the code that picks the base address to allocate from.
I am not 100% sure you should use a fixed base ad
