FWIW, I built it with libc5, hacking hsc with an editor wasn't very
appealing! Giuliano's bug report seems to be still outstanding, and
there's been no new release of glibc2.1 since.
Kevin
Simon Marlow writes:
On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 02:08:19PM +0100, I wrote:
However, it may have
On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 02:08:19PM +0100, I wrote:
However, it may have been a miscompiled glibc (this is the
libc6-2.1.1-7 Debian build), more news tomorrow when I find the
relevant mail messages.
It still does not work with the 2.1.1-9 build, so it may have been
something introduced
On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 02:08:19PM +0100, I wrote:
However, it may have been a miscompiled glibc (this is the
libc6-2.1.1-7 Debian build), more news tomorrow when I find the
relevant mail messages.
It still does not work with the 2.1.1-9 build, so it may have been
something introduced since
On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 11:18:34AM +0100, Giuliano P Procida wrote:
I will try to hack hsc with a binary editor to remove the fflush
call and see what happens.
OK, one hacked hsc and a couple more hours of compilation later and
I've run into another problem (compiling
Hi,
What's the latest on this problem? Since I've hit it too :-( Is it
possible to build ghc with egcs and glibc2.1 ?? I'm trying to build
from source using the pre-built ghc-4.02 linux binaries.
regards
Kevin
Giuliano P Procida [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No improvement, I'm
Hi.
On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 04:29:01AM +1000, Kevin Glynn wrote:
What's the latest on this problem? Since I've hit it too :-( Is it
possible to build ghc with egcs and glibc2.1 ?? I'm trying to build
from source using the pre-built ghc-4.02 linux binaries.
The latest is that it is still a
Giuliano P Procida [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 12:33:39PM -0700, Sigbjorn Finne
(Intl Vendor) wrote:
It looks sensible, shutdownHaskell() is the last thing the
RTS calls before exiting. Could it be that fflush() is failing
since stdout hasn't been used? Does the
Giuliano P Procida [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No improvement, I'm afraid.
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 01:16:01AM -0700, Sigbjorn Finne
(Intl Vendor) wrote:
The fflush in shutdownHaskell() should not be required any longer -
the behaviour it purports to work around is a non-issue to us
No improvement, I'm afraid.
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 01:16:01AM -0700, Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor) wrote:
The fflush in shutdownHaskell() should not be required any longer -
the behaviour it purports to work around is a non-issue to us now.
Removing it and recompiling the RTS you're linking
Hi.
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 10:10:20AM -0700, Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor) wrote:
Giuliano P Procida [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Easier said than done... it was a while before I realised
that removing the fflush and typing make just wasn't going to
hack it. This is because hsc is linked
Hello again.
On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 07:16:57AM -0700, Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor) wrote:
Other than that, I'm generally stumped as to why this is happening.
You could try to run 'hsc' from within gdb to see where it is failing
- compile PrelBase.o with -v to see the (long!) command-line
Giuliano P Procida [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
08549690 shutdownHaskell:
8549690: e8 4b 26 00 00 call 854bce0
finaliseWeakPointersNow
8549695: e8 26 23 00 00 call 854b9c0 exitStorage
854969a: 68 f0 32 5d 08 pushl $0x85d32f0
Giuliano P Procida [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
This is the compiler in action! Earlier in the strace there is:
write(2, "R", 1)= 1
write(2, "e", 1)= 1
This is part of the byte-by-byte output of "** Reader:\n" I thought IO
output had
13 matches
Mail list logo
