On a slightly related topic: I was a bit surprised to notice that
5.02.2 appears to produce binaries that are incompatible with 5.02.1,
given that it was only a minor version number change. It's
not a huge
deal (since this at least produced link errors), but it was a bit
surprising.
Certainly.
We've just spent lots of time trying to get this stuff to be utterly
painless to compile, so please let us know if the instructions below
give you any trouble.
The problem is that you didn't compile the whole program with -prof: the
BareBonesArrows library was compiled the
I tried this under Linux (debian, using ghc 5.02.2). It compiled OK,
but produced an executable that dumped core immediately on
startup. :-(
For what it's worth, here is as much info. as I could glean from gdb:
Starting program: /home/frp/afrp/src/testST
Program received signal
Simon Marlow wrote:
Profiling has received significant attention since we branched 5.02, but
I'm not aware of any segfault-type bugs in the 5.02 profiling
implementation. Could you perhaps send your sources and we'll look into
it (and the Win2k problem you had)?
Certainly.
We've just
Julian Seward (Intl Vendor) wrote:
| ghc.exe: panic! (the `impossible' happened, GHC version 5.02.1):
| Oversize heap check detected. Please try compiling with -O.
| [...]
Upgrade to 5.02.2, wherein this oversized-heap-check entertainment
is fixed.
Many thanks, Julian! I
I wrote:
I have now upgraded to 5.02.2, which gives me an entirely different
show-stopper bug when using -prof -auto-all:
---begin compilation output
[...output of succesfully compiling a bunch of library modules]
ghc -c -package lang -package concurrent
