Re: RegexString: was it really meant to be that way ?

2000-01-18 Thread Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
Tue, 11 Jan 2000 07:36:22 -0800, Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze: I'm tempted to junk the whole Regex library and replace it with one based on pcre, actually. http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~meurig/regexp/ looks interesting, is written in Haskell, but is quite big and seems to be not

RE: RegexString: was it really meant to be that way ?

2000-01-11 Thread Simon Marlow
Ian Jackson writes ("RE: RegexString: was it really meant to be that way ?"): I've just tried my version of RegexString with a compiler snapshot obtained by using cvs up -D '25 December 1999' and it doesn't work properly any more. It seems that re_match now gives a REmatch whose

RE: RegexString: was it really meant to be that way ?

2000-01-11 Thread Simon Marlow
I've just tried my version of RegexString with a compiler snapshot obtained by using cvs up -D '25 December 1999' and it doesn't work properly any more. It seems that re_match now gives a REmatch whose first field, Array Int GroupBounds, is always indexed from 0 to some moderately large

RE: RegexString: was it really meant to be that way ?

2000-01-05 Thread Simon Marlow
You must think I'm making a terrible nuisance of myself. Please tell me to go away and real manuals if I'm being annoying or clueless. Anyway, I have another problem, with RegexString this time. I was trying to use mkRegex and matchRegex and I get this error: Fail: Ix{Int}.index: