On 10 August 2005 09:04, Frederik Eaton wrote:
>>> Compiling a module which imports the 14 smaller modules takes much
>>> less time than compiling the monolithic module - it's almost 5 times
>>> faster (see below).
>>
>> We've found the cause of this, and committed a fix. The full
>> HTMLMonda98
> > Compiling a module which imports the 14 smaller modules takes much
> > less time than compiling the monolithic module - it's almost 5 times
> > faster (see below).
>
> We've found the cause of this, and committed a fix. The full
> HTMLMonda98.hs now compiles in 27 seconds for me, without opti
On 06 July 2005 23:38, Frederik Eaton wrote:
>> When I compile WASH it takes forever for ghc to finish compiling
>> HTMLMonad98, and on my powerpc system with 151MB free RAM, gcc
>> crashes during the compile. Should some of the larger WASH modules
>> maybe be split into multiple files? I get the
> When I compile WASH it takes forever for ghc to finish compiling
> HTMLMonad98, and on my powerpc system with 151MB free RAM, gcc crashes
> during the compile. Should some of the larger WASH modules maybe be
> split into multiple files? I get the sense that ghc compilation
> time/memory is super-
