> > Our example was compiling happy. happy does not import anything from
> > cabal-0.5 and yet it was hit by this problem. Unless we consider 'part
> > of the program' to be all modules in all exposed packages (and all
> > modules in 'efectively exposed' packages like util via the cabal-0.5
> > dep
On 06 April 2005 00:06, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 23:34 +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
>>> Well it turns out that we had another package installed that depends
>>> on the util package (cabal-0.5 as it happens) and that package is
>>> exposed by default. It seems that this implicitly
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 23:34 +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> > Well it turns out that we had another package installed that depends
> > on the util package (cabal-0.5 as it happens) and that package is
> > exposed by default. It seems that this implicitly exposes the util
> > package.
>
> This is the
On 05 April 2005 21:33, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> Over in Gentoo Haskell packaging land, while trying to get all our
> progs and libs to work with GHC 6.4, we came across a couple programs
> that were failing to compile with this error message:
>
> GetOpt.lhs:1:0:
> Module `GetOpt' is a member o
Hi all,
Over in Gentoo Haskell packaging land, while trying to get all our progs
and libs to work with GHC 6.4, we came across a couple programs that
were failing to compile with this error message:
GetOpt.lhs:1:0:
Module `GetOpt' is a member of package util-1.0.
To compile this module, p
