RE: floating point literals

2003-03-19 Thread Simon Marlow
Simon Marlow wrote: On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 10:33:47AM +, Ross Paterson wrote: GHC doesn't recognize literals like 9e2, and nor does lex. Correction: GHC doesn't recognize 9e2 lex is confused by 0xy, 0oy, 9e+y and 9.0e+y Fixed GHC, I'll leave lex to someone more

Re: floating point literals

2003-03-18 Thread Dean Herington
Simon Marlow wrote: On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 10:33:47AM +, Ross Paterson wrote: GHC doesn't recognize literals like 9e2, and nor does lex. Correction: GHC doesn't recognize 9e2 lex is confused by 0xy, 0oy, 9e+y and 9.0e+y Fixed GHC, I'll leave lex to someone more familiar with

Re: floating point literals

2003-03-18 Thread Jon Fairbairn
On 2003-03-18 at 12:44EST Dean Herington wrote: Simon Marlow wrote: On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 10:33:47AM +, Ross Paterson wrote: GHC doesn't recognize literals like 9e2, and nor does lex. Fixed GHC, I'll leave lex to someone more familiar with the code... Cheers, Simon

floating point literals

2003-03-17 Thread Ross Paterson
GHC doesn't recognize literals like 9e2, and nor does lex. ___ Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs

RE: floating point literals

2003-03-17 Thread Simon Marlow
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 10:33:47AM +, Ross Paterson wrote: GHC doesn't recognize literals like 9e2, and nor does lex. Correction: GHC doesn't recognize 9e2 lex is confused by 0xy, 0oy, 9e+y and 9.0e+y Fixed GHC, I'll leave lex to someone more familiar with the code... Cheers,