Simon Marlow wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 10:33:47AM +, Ross Paterson wrote:
GHC doesn't recognize literals like 9e2, and nor does lex.
Correction:
GHC doesn't recognize 9e2
lex is confused by 0xy, 0oy, 9e+y and 9.0e+y
Fixed GHC, I'll leave lex to someone more
Simon Marlow wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 10:33:47AM +, Ross Paterson wrote:
GHC doesn't recognize literals like 9e2, and nor does lex.
Correction:
GHC doesn't recognize 9e2
lex is confused by 0xy, 0oy, 9e+y and 9.0e+y
Fixed GHC, I'll leave lex to someone more familiar with
On 2003-03-18 at 12:44EST Dean Herington wrote:
Simon Marlow wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 10:33:47AM +, Ross Paterson wrote:
GHC doesn't recognize literals like 9e2, and nor does lex.
Fixed GHC, I'll leave lex to someone more familiar with the code...
Cheers,
Simon
GHC doesn't recognize literals like 9e2, and nor does lex.
___
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 10:33:47AM +, Ross Paterson wrote:
GHC doesn't recognize literals like 9e2, and nor does lex.
Correction:
GHC doesn't recognize 9e2
lex is confused by 0xy, 0oy, 9e+y and 9.0e+y
Fixed GHC, I'll leave lex to someone more familiar with the code...
Cheers,