Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
for future distributions, I'll switch back to supplying our own
statically-linked libgmp.a for Linux, I think.
This is not required for package-manager managed binaries
for systems that have a package containing `libgmp.so' (like
RedHat, but not
"Manuel M. T. Chakravarty" wrote:
[...]
In the case of SuSE, IMHO, the Right Thing is a bug report to SuSE.
Done.
Cheers,
Sven
--
Sven PanneTel.: +49/89/2178-2235
LMU, Institut fuer Informatik FAX : +49/89/2178-2211
LFE
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
for future distributions, I'll switch back to supplying our own
statically-linked libgmp.a for Linux, I think.
This is not required for package-manager managed binaries
for systems that have a package
I've been trying literally a dozen times to build a GHC from CVS, but
have not yet succeeded. The problem is to find a "right"
compiler which
runs on my SuSE 6.2 system *and* compiles the sources. I won't go into
the very sad and depressing details here, so my question simply is:
Has
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
for future distributions, I'll switch back to supplying our own
statically-linked libgmp.a for Linux, I think.
This is not required for package-manager managed binaries
for systems that have a package containing `libgmp.so' (like
RedHat, but not SuSE).
Armin Größlinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
I've been trying literally a dozen times to build a GHC from CVS, but
have not yet succeeded. The problem is to find a "right" compiler which
runs on my SuSE 6.2 system *and* compiles the sources. I won't go into
the very sad and depressing
