panic! (the `impossible' happened):

1997-04-17 Thread Ralf Hinze
=============== > ghc-2.02 -v -c Set.lhs The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System, version 2.02, patchlevel 0 literate pre-processor: echo '#line 1 "Set.lhs"' > /tmp/ghc3903.lpp &&am

panic! (the `impossible' happened)

1999-01-21 Thread Martin Leucker
='-}' -DEND_GHC_ONLY='{-' -DBEGIN_NOT_FOR_GHC='{-' -DEND_NOT_FOR_GHC='-}' -DELSE_FOR_GHC='-}-}' -c main/Main.lhs -o main/Main.o panic! (the `impossible' happened): dsExpr: tuple pattern: let { fail = patError __a (IO ()) __string

panic! (the `impossible' happened):

2000-01-28 Thread George Russell
f o panic! (the `impossible' happened): cgEvalAlts: dodgy case of unboxed tuple type Please report it as a compiler bug to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using gcc2.95.2 with -m32 option; this option is necessary because by default gcc uses 64 bit things and GHC barfs at that. (It shoul

panic! (the `impossible' happened): deListComp:LetQual

1997-02-05 Thread Johannes Waldmann
hello. I am using ghc-2.01 on alpha-dec-osf4.0 (the binary package - base and prof). ghc has trouble compiling let expressions inside list comprehensions. when i replace let foo = bar with foo <- [bar], then everything seems to work. is this a known bug? (if no, do you need example files that re

Re: panic! (the `impossible' happened):

1997-04-19 Thread Sigbjorn Finne
Hi, thanks for the report - the compiler does not gracefully deal with duplicate method definitions coming from your Set [] instance: class Set set where ... size :: (Ord a) => set a -> Int ... instance Set [] where ... size = length size = genericLength .. delete the latt

Panic: the impossible happened! (3.02)

1998-06-12 Thread Mariano Suarez Alvarez
fier still going after 4 iterations; bailing out. NOTE: Simplifier still going after 4 iterations; bailing out. Warning: discarding polymorphic case: PrelErr.error{-87-} _@_ RExp.Set{-rTV-} Map.$ga{-rS7-} panic! (the `impossible' happened): lo

RE: panic! (the `impossible' happened)

1999-01-21 Thread Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)
x27; -DEND_NOT_FOR_GHC='-}' > -DELSE_FOR_GHC='-}-}' -c main/Main.lhs -o main/Main.o > > panic! (the `impossible' happened): > dsExpr: tuple pattern: > let { fail = patError __a (IO ()) __string "Main.lhs:540|case" > } in > case d

Re: panic! (the `impossible' happened):

2000-02-01 Thread George Russell
f __rm_food ; fi ; > ../../ghc/driver/ghc-inplace -recomp -cpp -optC-fglasgow-exts -fvia-C -Rghc-timing >-I../../ghc/includes -imonads -static -O -split-objs -odir Weak -H20m -H30m >-Onot -c Weak.lhs -o Weak.o -osuf o > > panic! (the `impossible' happened): >

Re: panic! (the `impossible' happened): deListComp:LetQual

1997-02-05 Thread Simon L Peyton Jones
| ghc has trouble compiling let expressions inside list comprehensions. | when i replace let foo =3D bar with foo <- [bar], then everything seems | to work. | | is this a known bug? (if no, do you need example files that reporduce it?= | ) | | is my workaround morally correct (strictness, polym

panic! (the `impossible' happened): tcInstType:1

1997-06-15 Thread Einar Wolfgang Karlsen
-- X-Sun-Data-Type: text X-Sun-Data-Description: text X-Sun-Data-Name: text X-Sun-Charset: us-ascii X-Sun-Content-Lines: 9 During compilation of the enclosed module, the following happened: panic! (the `impossible' happened): tcInstType:1 Herewith reported as a GHC 2.04 bug.

Re: Panic: the impossible happened! (3.02)

1998-06-12 Thread Sigbjorn Finne
Mariano Suarez Alvarez writes: > Compiling lx (the lexical analyser generator) with -O, everything goes > smoothly until we get to the main file Lx.hs, on which ghc-3.02 panics > and dies. The (long!) -v output is included below. If I compile without > -O, everything is fine. > Hi, thanks - lo

panic! (the `impossible' happened):lookupBindC:no info!

1998-08-05 Thread Thomas Nordin
iterations; bailing out. panic! (the `impossible' happened): lookupBindC:no info! for: actionFunction_sqBJ (probably: data dependencies broken by an optimisation pas s) static binds for: ProduceCode.$g

Re: panic! (the `impossible' happened): tcInstType:1

1997-06-15 Thread Sigbjorn Finne
> > During compilation of the enclosed module, the following happened: > > panic! (the `impossible' happened): > tcInstType:1 > > Herewith reported as a GHC 2.04 bug. > Here's what I get when compiling it foo$ $ghc/driver/ghc -c -noC guiv.hs guiv

Re: panic! (the `impossible' happened): tcInstType:1

1997-06-17 Thread Sigbjorn Finne
Einar Wolfgang Karlsen writes: > > odd instance decl - is this really the file that shows up the bug? > > > > The file is the "correct" one - Yes. I played around with some of the > ghc options. It seems as if it is -fglasgow-exts that is causing the > problem. [...] > Thanks, -fglasgow-ext

panic! (the `impossible' happened) in ghc-2.09

1997-12-02 Thread Byron Cook
ran into this bug when compiling with the optimization flags: -H10M -O -fvia-C -O2-for-C " NOTE: Simplifier still going after 4 iterations; bailing out. NOTE: Simplifier still going after 4 iterations; bailing out. panic! (the `impossible' happened): getWorkerIdAndCons de

panic! (the `impossible' happened) (2.09, patchlevel 0)

1997-12-17 Thread Joern Dinkla
{- Hi, Compiling the following module results in the following error message (with GHC 2.09, patchlevel 0, i386-linux -- panic! (the `impossible' happened): getWorkerIdAndCons area2{-r3g,

Re: panic! (the `impossible' happened):lookupBindC:no info!

1998-08-06 Thread Sigbjorn Finne
Thomas Nordin writes: > Hi ghc-3.02 on cywin32 19.3 told me to mail this to you, from > compiling Happy 1.5: > > /usr/local/bin/ghc -cpp -fhaskell-1.3 -fglasgow-exts -O -H12m-c ProduceCode. > lhs -o ProduceCode.o -osuf o > > > panic! (the `impossible' happen

Re: panic! (the `impossible' happened) (2.09, patchlevel 0)

1997-12-19 Thread Simon L Peyton Jones
> {- >Hi, > >Compiling the following module results in the following error message >(with GHC 2.09, patchlevel 0, i386-linux > > > ---------- > panic! (the `impossible' happene

Re: panic! (the `impossible' happened) in ghc-2.09

1997-12-04 Thread Simon L Peyton Jones
> ran into this bug when compiling with the optimization flags: > -H10M -O -fvia-C -O2-for-C > > " > NOTE: Simplifier still going after 4 iterations; bailing out. > > NOTE: Simplifier still going after 4 iterations; bailing out. > > p