Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote,
> "Manuel M. T. Chakravarty" wrote:
> > Isn't there still a difference? When the C-library changes
> > (ie, you get a new version) and the definition of `Status'
> > changes to [...]
> > The IDL binding would produce wrong code, but the Green Card
> > bindin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Carl R. Witty) wrote,
> Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The Green Card binding will definitely be correct, but AFAIK the IDL
> > binding will be not. This was one of my main motivations for preferring
> > Green Card to H/Direct. To the IDL wizards: Is there a *sim
"Sigbjorn Finne (Intl Vendor)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote,
[...]
> Having a .h -> .idl route would be helpful (at least until .idl has
> supplanted the use .h as a means to specify libs ;-), but I'm probably
> not going to invest any more time developing HDirect (or GreenCard),
> so if anyone feel
Hi,
See http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~sof/ghc-win32.html
Regards,
Michael
-Original Message-
From: qlam9731 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 31 aadaciy 1999 d. 1:09
Subject: haskell compiler for pc
>dear sir/madam,
>
>I'm looking for a haskell compiler t
