Hi!
Could someone please tell me the status of the various parellel modes of
ghc 4.08? I remember building the smp version of 4.07 a while back, and
while I could build a gph program under the smp-enable compiler, and I did
observe context-switches occurring more often, it did not seem to take
a
Lennart Augustsson wrote:
> By definition, if you follow the standard you can't be wrong. :)
> But the standard can be wrong. Perhaps this is a typo in the report?
I think I looked at this a while back. The standard is kaput. It gets even
worse if you try to make sense of the definitions of suc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Michael Weber writes (on the ghc-users list):
> > I'm slightly puzzled about the definition of list enumerations in
> > GHC (and possibly other Haskell implementations)...
> >
> > ``[0.0, 2 .. 9] :: [Float]''
> > ==> [0.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0]
> >
> > Never
Michael Weber writes (on the ghc-users list):
> I'm slightly puzzled about the definition of list enumerations in
> GHC (and possibly other Haskell implementations)...
>
> ``[0.0, 2 .. 9] :: [Float]''
> ==> [0.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0]
>
> Nevertheless, this behaviour is defined by the
I get the following compile error:
(My configuration is Linux kernel 2.4.0-test1, gcc 2.91.66 and
ghc 4.06 installed)
PWD = /home/gemi/fptools/ghc/lib/std
rm -f PrelBase.o ; if [ ! -d PrelBase ]; then mkdir PrelBase; else
07 Jul 2000 00:24:01 +0900, Jens-Ulrik Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> /home/juhp/haskell/ghc/ghc/driver/../rts/libHSrts.a(Schedule.o): In function
>`threadStackOverflow':
> Schedule.o(.text+0x7a0): undefined reference to `PrelException_stackOverflow_closure'
> /home/juhp/haskell/ghc/ghc/d
The profiling imports were in the wrong place in the InstallShield for
4.08 (now fixed).
If you've been bitten and don't fancy re-downloading, then just move the
contents of \ghc\ghc-4.08\imports into
\ghc\ghc-4.08\lib\imports, and all should be fine.
--
http://sc3d.org/rrt/ | wit, n. educated
| Sorry for the ignorance, just two questions on 4-08-notes.sgml.
|
| > Result type signatures now work.
Check out the user guide, under Language extensions/ Scoped type variables.
| > Constant folding is now done by Rules
Ditto Language extensions/Rewrite rules. Constant folding is doing th
Dear GHC,
Sorry for the ignorance, just two questions on 4-08-notes.sgml.
> Result type signatures now work.
>
> [..]
>
> Constant folding is now done by Rules
What do these two mean, or where they are explained?
Maybe, you can give an example?
--
Sergey Mechveliani
[EMAIL PR
