Could ghc-5.00 explain, please, some changes in the compiler and
RTS options?
1. -hi-diffs worked in ghc-4.08 and now does not.
2. I applied -optCrts-G3 -optCrts-F1.5 -optCrts-M28m
to compile certain large module on 32Mb RAM machine.
Now, what to apply for this with ghc-5.00 ?
Than
ghc --make would be wonderful for UniForM, which at the moment consists of
a large selection of libraries, were it not for the restriction that
ghc --make insists on only having one module as an argument. Er why?
At this rate I shall be driven to writing an otherwise useless module
which imports
In Hugs I can throw some definitions into a file and load it
on the shell command line or using ":l" in Hugs.
ghci however will complain that "main" is missing and even won't keep
the defined functions in scope. Is there anything I can do about that?
It even doesn't invoke main if it's present.
Tue, 24 Apr 2001 16:19:21 +0200, Volker Stolz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pisze:
> ghci however will complain that "main" is missing and even won't keep
> the defined functions in scope. Is there anything I can do about that?
Add 'module Foo where' at the top of the file (preferably with the
module nam
| 2. I applied -optCrts-G3 -optCrts-F1.5 -optCrts-M28m
|
| to compile certain large module on 32Mb RAM machine.
| Now, what to apply for this with ghc-5.00 ?
+RTS -G3 -F1.5 -M28m -RTS
J
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Axel -
While browising FAQs and message boards I found a question you had
posted a few months ago. I decided to write
you in case you had not learned the answer yet. (I remember this answer
was pretty tough to find when I needed it!)
Hello,
I have two questions on ghc-5.00 -make.
The User's Guide says in Section 4.5 that it is simpler to use
-make than the Makefile technique.
1. I try ghc -make Main.hs
with Main.hs containing main = putStr "hello\n"
(in ghc-5.00, binary, i386-unknown, Linux),
a
