Re: GHC 5.02.1 on Mac OS X

2001-12-03 Thread Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
Sébastien Carlier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > > Did you already check them into CVS? > > The harmless and clean ones, yes. I'll take the time to clean up > and commit the rest to the repository before the end of the week. > I can also mail you my patched in the meantime. We won't start on thi

RE: ghc and hierarchical module names

2001-12-03 Thread Simon Marlow
[ thread moved from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > "Simon Marlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > You must give the full module name in the header, eg. > > > module A.B.C where > > This surprised me somewhat, and I must have missed any > discussion/rationale. Could you elabo

Re: ghc and hierarchical module names

2001-12-03 Thread Ketil Z Malde
"Simon Marlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You must give the full module name in the header, eg. > module A.B.C where This surprised me somewhat, and I must have missed any discussion/rationale. Could you elaborate/point me at the relevant information? It seems to me that A.B could b

Re: GHC 5.02.1 on Mac OS X

2001-12-03 Thread Sébastien Carlier
> Are your patches (I mean the old ones) public? Yes, of course. They were on the download page of ghc's web site, but since the release of GHC 5.02.1 they are no longer there. > Did you already check them into CVS? The harmless and clean ones, yes. I'll take the time to clean up and commit

RE: GHC 5.02.1 on Mac OS X

2001-12-03 Thread Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
Nicolas Oury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > > We may be doing some work on Mac OS X here over summer > > (that's *southern* hemisphere summer!) > More generaly, how hard these kinds of ports are. (How much code must you > rewrite?) It's not so much a question of how much code, but how complicated

RE: ghc and hierarchical module names

2001-12-03 Thread Simon Marlow
> The release notes for ghc 5.02.1 say: > >1.4.4. New experimental features > > Partial support for hierarchical module names. > > - but I could not find a document describing how to use this feature. > > Is it possible to use hierarchical module names with ghc at > present, and

Re: GHC 5.02.1 on Mac OS X

2001-12-03 Thread Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
Sébastien Carlier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > > > Sebastien Carlier [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] was at one time working on > > a MacOSX port, but I don't know how far he got. > > I worked on the unregisterised (via-C) build of GHC. My patches solved > most of the incompati

Re: GHC 5.02.1 on Mac OS X

2001-12-03 Thread Sébastien Carlier
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > Sebastien Carlier [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] was at one time working on > a MacOSX port, but I don't know how far he got. I worked on the unregisterised (via-C) build of GHC. My patches solved most of the incompatibilities with Apple's version of GCC, and the problems wit

RE: GHC 5.02.1 on Mac OS X

2001-12-03 Thread Nicolas Oury
Hi there, > We may be doing some work on Mac OS X here over summer > (that's *southern* hemisphere summer!) More generaly, how hard these kinds of ports are. (How much code must you rewrite?) Best regards, Nicolas Oury ___ Glasgow-haskell-users maili

RE: GHC 5.02.1 on Mac OS X

2001-12-03 Thread Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
"Simon Peyton-Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > Sebastien Carlier [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] was at one time working on > a MacOSX port, but I don't know how far he got. There was one > other person too, but I can't lay my hands on appropriate email. The other person was Atze Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTE

RE: GHC 5.02.1 on Mac OS X

2001-12-03 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
Sebastien Carlier [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] was at one time working on a MacOSX port, but I don't know how far he got. There was one other person too, but I can't lay my hands on appropriate email. Simon | -Original Message- | From: Ashley Yakeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | Sent: 02 Decem