hi, i wrote some utilities to make my coding a little easier and i put them in some
libraries. then to use them i made a package conf file and added it with ghc-pkg -a. i
then tried compiling them with
ghc -package-name extensions -c Foo.hs
but i am not sure i am compiling it right as i get li
> sounds familiar, and I've got to admit that the ffi part sounds more
> interesting;-)
I think I did the interesting part about a year and a half ago when I
first wrote an ffi-like system. I'm now contemplating how to make the
configure system automagically detect how to build shared object fi
> A long-term goal is to refactor the code into a portable layer, a
> layer which can be ported (i.e., a maze of ifdefs) and a
> machine-dependent layer. I'm not sure when I'll get to that - work,
> my current ffi hacking and some personal stuff are consuming all my
> time.
sounds familiar, and
>> I guess the Win32 version has fallen behind.
> Yet in other aspects, the SOE version is ahead.. Would it be
> possible to resynch the various versions?
A long-term goal is to refactor the code into a portable layer, a
layer which can be ported (i.e., a maze of ifdefs) and a
machine-dependen
---
Two suggestions for CVS maintainers:
1. we could make better use of the cvs.haskell.org home page:
- add a link to the cvs-web interface proper
- add an overview of what is where in the cvs tree
(probably best generated automatically from brief description
