System.system broken?

2002-07-16 Thread John Meacham
is System.system broken in 5.04? i am using the rpm provided on the web site and this call appears to be broken. in particular, using strace i find that it is attempting the following call [pid 16975] execve("n/sh", ["/bin/sh", "-c", "echo foo"], [/* 67 vars */]) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or dir

RE: Unregisterised build

2002-07-16 Thread Christoph Reichenbach
Hi, [...] > BTW the cross-port script is a little old, so you might find other > problems. As far as I know, unregisterised compilation *does* work > though. I had to do a number of manual compiles, out-of-order makes etc. to get stuff working; I'm not completely convinced that what I'm trying

Re: package name mismatch

2002-07-16 Thread George Russell
Simon Marlow wrote: [snip] > Can't you just fix your build so that the situation doesn't occur? [snip] Grumble. Yes, I suppose so. I hate being an implementor instead of a bug-reporter. ___ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ww

new RTS interface problem with ghc-5.04

2002-07-16 Thread Keean
I have just moved to ghc-5.04 to try the threaded runtime, however some code I have to do dynaminc module loading using the rts linker will not compile, failing with: RtsAPIDeprec.o undefined reference to Addr_Azh_con_info (in rts_mkAddr) this symbol appears to be defined in libHSlang.a, and I h

RE: package name mismatch

2002-07-16 Thread Simon Marlow
> It must have been only a warning in 5.02.3, or I could never have > compiled it there. (Before 5.02.3 we didn't use the package > system like this at all.) > > Actually I would like this message to go away altogether in this case, > if possible. The actual situation is that GetPut.hs is in fa

RE: profiling objects (segmentation fault)

2002-07-16 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
It's still on our to-do list, and we've just thought of a nice way to do it too. So it's just moved up into "let's do it" status. Thanks for the reminder Simon | -Original Message- | From: MR K P SCHUPKE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] | Sent: 15 July 2002 17:20 | To: glasgow-haskell-user

RE: replacing the Prelude (again)

2002-07-16 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
|Ambiguities in the class Num are most common, so Haskell | provides another |way to resolve them---with a default declaration: |default (t1 , ... , tn) |where n>=0, and each ti must be a monotype for which Num ti holds. | ^^