> I have some CGI programs running with Hugs and I want to use GHC
> instead.
>
> What changes must I do to the .hs file?
>
> Is it an easy job?
Depends on lots of things really.
The CGI library that comes with GHC is documented here:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/network/Ne
Claus,
It may be possible to get the two representations together by applying the
predicate to a "reader" for x, generated from x, which would complement
something like Hood's "writer" for x, generated from x. Just as the context
demanding parts of x isn't aware of triggering observations, the p
Dean Herington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, getting the right amount of strictness--and in the right places--can be
> tricky.
Tell me about it!
> You should do the counting strictly:
>
> Just n -> case n+1 of n1 -> addToFM f w n1
Thanks for the tip. Just performing this change
> You should do the counting strictly:
>
> Just n -> case n+1 of n1 -> addToFM f w n1
Careful - that case expression doesn't actually force n to be evaluated.
It's exactly equivalent to
let n1 = n+1 in addToFM f w n1
You need to use seq to force evaluation.
Cheers,
A couple of hours ago, I wrote (in reponse to Claus Reinke's suggestion):
Thanks for this further suggestion. A solution along these lines
might be
possible, but it would still be restricted ...
Actually a mild variant of Claus's proposal seems to work out
quite well. Another way to avoid the
Does this mean you can womble along with Claus's suggestion? I'm
feeling a bit swamped at the moment, and not keen to undertake another
open-ended implementation exercise. So if you can manage without, and
perhaps use the experience to refine the specification of a Really
Useful Feature, that'd b
Simon,
Does this mean you can womble along with Claus's suggestion? I'm
feeling a bit swamped at the moment, and not keen to undertake another
open-ended implementation exercise. So if you can manage without, and
perhaps use the experience to refine the specification of a Really
Useful Feature,
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 11:00:13AM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
>
> > I have some CGI programs running with Hugs and I want to use GHC
> > instead.
> >
> > What changes must I do to the .hs file?
> >
> > Is it an easy job?
>
> Depends on lots of things really.
>
> The CGI library that comes wi
I have been attempting to solve some outstanding problems with
building hmake, nhc98, and hat, using ghc under Windows. I don't
have a Windows machine of my own, but our Dept has some public-access
Windows 2000 Pro machines I can use. However, when I try to use the
ghc .msi automatic installer pa
> Actually a mild variant of Claus's proposal seems to work out
> quite well. Another way to avoid the problems with types is
> to use a multi-parameter type class. Little example attached.
Glad to be of help. The need to shadow the data types is a bit
annoying, but then the whole generic bit w
10 matches
Mail list logo
