On Monday, June 30, 2003, at 01:52 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
If you pass a list of .o files---and only .o files (i.e. no .hs
files)---to GHC, and --make is specified, nothing happens. Is it
possible to change this behaviour so that GHC will link the .o files
together into an executable?
Not possibl
In local.glasgow-haskell-users, you wrote:
>>> I've been using sockets and handles with ghc-5.04.3.
>>> The strange thing is now that when I make a handle
>>> out of a socket and ask whether the handle is readable
>>> or writable, it returns True for the former and False
>>> for the latter, althoug
On Friday, June 27, 2003, at 07:08 PM, Volker Stolz wrote:
[Moving to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In local.haskell, you wrote:
I've been using sockets and handles with ghc-5.04.3.
The strange thing is now that when I make a handle
out of a socket and ask whether the handle is readable
or writable, it retur
Am 23. Jun 2003 um 12:05 CEST schrieb Simon Marlow:
> Could you explain how this works? writeChan doesn't update the count -
> it should, right? But if it does, won't there be race conditions when
> read & write happen at the same time?
I updated the file at http://www.foldr.org/~stolz/Chan2.hs
> If you pass a list of .o files---and only .o files (i.e. no .hs
> files)---to GHC, and --make is specified, nothing happens. Is it
> possible to change this behaviour so that GHC will link the .o files
> together into an executable?
Not possible at the moment, I'm afraid. GHC's intelligenc
